Therapeutic efficacy of alternative primaquine regimens to standard treatment in preventing relapses by Plasmodium vivax: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Eficacia terapéutica de esquemas de Primaquina usados como alternativa al tratamiento estándar en la prevención de recaídas por Plasmodium vivax: Una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis

Lina Marcela Zuluaga-Idarraga^1,2, María-Eulalia Tamayo Perez^3,4, Daniel Camilo Aguirre-Acevedo³.

¹ Grupo Malaria, Facultad de Medicina. Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín, Colombia.
² Grupo Epidemiología y Bioestadística, Facultad de Medicina. Universidad CES. Medellín, Colombia.
³ Grupo Académico de Epidemiología Clínica, Facultad de Medicina. Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín, Colombia.
⁴ Departamento de Pediatría, Universidad de Antioquia, Fundacion Hospital Universitario San Vicente, Medellín, Colombia.

Martin AM, Maradei SJ, Velasco HM. Therapeutic efficacy of alternative primaquine regimens to standard treatment in preventing relapses by Plasmodium vivax: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colomb Med (Cali). 2015; 46(4): 183-91.

© 2015. Universidad del Valle. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 17 September 2015 - Revised: 11 November 2015 - Accepted: 01 December 2015

Corresponding author:

Lina Marcela Zuluaga-Idarraga. Grupo Malqaria. Facultad de Medicina. Universidad de Antioquia, Sede de Investigación Universitaria (SIU), laboratorio 610. Calle 62 # 52-59. Medellín, Colombia. Phone: +57 4 2196585 Fax: +57 4 2196487. E-mail: lmzuluaga@ces.edu.co.

Abstract

Objective: To compare efficacy and safety of primaquine regimens currently used to prevent relapses by P. vivax.
Methods: A systematic review was carried out to identify clinical trials evaluating efficacy and safety to prevent malaria recurrences by P. vivax of primaquine regimen 0.5 mg/kg/day for 7 or 14 days compared to standard regimen of 0.25 mg/kg/day for 14 days. Efficacy of primaquine according to cumulative incidence of recurrences after 28 days was determined. The overall relative risk with fixed-effects meta-analysis was estimated.
Results: For the regimen 0.5 mg/kg/day/7 days were identified 7 studies, which showed an incidence of recurrence between 0% and 20% with follow-up 60-210 days; only 4 studies comparing with the standard regimen 0.25 mg/kg/day/14 days and no difference in recurrences between both regimens (RR= 0.977, 95% CI= 0.670 to 1.423) were found. 3 clinical trials using regimen 0.5 mg/kg/day/14 days with an incidence of recurrences between 1.8% and 18.0% during 330-365 days were identified; only one study comparing with the standard regimen (RR= 0.846, 95% CI= 0.484 to 1.477). High risk of bias and differences in handling of included studies were found.
Conclusion: Available evidence is insufficient to determine whether currently PQ regimens used as alternative rather than standard treatment have better efficacy and safety in preventing relapse of P. vivax. Clinical trials are required to guide changes in treatment regimen of malaria vivax.

Keywords:

Resumen

Objetivo: Comparar la eficacia y seguridad de los esquemas de primaquina actualmente usados para prevenir las recaídas de malaria por P. vivax.
Métodos: A través de una revisión sistemática se identificaron ensayos clínicos que evaluaran la eficacia y seguridad para prevenir recurrencias por P. vivax del régimen de primaquina 0.5 mg/Kg/día por 7 o 14 días comparado al régimen estándar de 0.25 mg/Kg/día por 14 días. Se determinó la eficacia de primaquina con la incidencia acumulada de recurrencias posterior a 28 días. Se estimó el riesgo relativo global con un meta-análisis de efectos fijos.
Resultados: Se identificaron 7 ensayos clínicos para el régimen 0.5 mg/Kg/día/7 días que mostraron una incidencia de recurrencias entre 0% y 20% con un seguimiento de 60 a 210 días; solo 4 estudios compararon con el régimen estándar y no se encontraron diferencias en las recurrencias entre ambos esquemas (RR= 0.977; IC 95%= 0.670-1.423). Se identificaron tres ensayos clínicos que usaron el esquema 0.5 mg/Kg/día/14 días con una incidencia de recurrencias entre 1.8% y 18.0% para 330 a 365 días; solo un estudio comparó con el régimen estándar (RR= 0.846; IC 95%= 0.484-1.477). Se encontró alto riesgo de sesgo y diferencias en la conducción de los estudios incluidos.
Conclusión: No hay suficiente evidencia para determinar si los regímenes de primaquina usados como alternativas al tratamiento estándar tienen mejor eficacia para prevenir las recaídas de P. vivax. Se requieren ensayos clínicos para orientar los cambios en el esquema de tratamiento de este tipo de malaria.

Palabras clave:

Malaria, Plasmodium vivax, farmacovigilancia, primaquina, recurrencia.

Introduction

Malaria caused by Plasmodium vivax is a major public health problem, about 20 million cases of malaria worldwide occur by this species, mainly in Asia and The Americas^1,2. This species is characterized by the formation of a hepatic stage known as hipnozoite that lies dormant in the liver and can reactivate causing a relapse after treatment and cure of primary episode³. Different relapse patterns are acknowledged for P. vivax, but two are prevailing 1) The pattern of tropical regions having a first relapse early and later relapses in short time intervals, usually every month; this pattern prevails in South America, Southeast Asia and Oceania². The predominant pattern in mild regions in Europe and Asia has a first late relapse usually between 8 and 10 months later and later short-term episodes^3-5. Although it is unclear what causes the reactivation of hypnozoites, this phenomenon is one of the main obstacles to the elimination of malaria, since they maintain active transmission of the disease^2,6.

In order to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of treatment regimens for P. vivax, these must be administered and supervised so patients must be monitored during the first post-treatment month in order to ensure the cure of the primary attack and then monitor relapses⁸. Usually these studies are conducted in endemic regions where relapses and reinfections (a new reinfection from the mosquite bite) can occur simultaneously and are indistinguishable by conventional diagnostic methods; therefore, the assessment of the therapeutic efficacy of the PQ has been measured in terms of recurrences including both relapses and reinfections^9,10.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the use of PQ under the regimen 0.25 mg/kg/day for 14 days (3.5 mg/kg total dose), for which a better efficacy has been demonstrated in six months compared with regimens shorter in 3 or 5 days of the same daily dose (RR= 3.18 for the development of recurrences, 95% CI= 2.1 to 4.81 and RR= 10.05; 95% CI= 2.82 to 35.86, to schemes 3 and 5 respectively compared with the standard regimen)¹⁰. The incidence of recurrences for the standard regimen after a supervised treatment varies from 0% to 32% with a follow-up between 90 and 365 days¹¹. This large variation can be attributed to the complexity of the assessment of therapeutic efficacy of this antimalarial where several factors are involved, such as the efficiency of the blood schizontocidal, the length of the follow-up, adjustment of the dose by body weight, drug absorption and metabolism, level of malaria transmission during the study (in case of endemic area), the relapse pattern of the P. vivax strain, the origin of the strain and the diagnostic method for evaluating recurrences^3,9.

Although most endemic countries follow the WHO recommendation to use PQ in the first-line treatment of P. vivax malaria, some countries are currently using alternative regimens such as applying twice the standard daily dose (0.5 mg/kg/day) during 7 days (3.5 mg/kg total dose) or 14 days (7 mg/kg total dose)², the latter is recommended by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the United States¹². Although changes in PQ treatment protocols have been implemented in order to improve adherence and reduce relapses, the efficacy and safety of these alternative regimens, compared to the standard regimen, is unknown.

The primary objective of this systematic review was to compare the efficacy and safety of the PQ regimen of 0.5 mg/kg/day for 7 days with the standard regimen of 0.25 mg/kg/day for 14 days in patients infected with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria. The secondary objective was comparing the PQ regimen of 0.5 mg/kg/day for 14 days with the standard regimen.

Materials and Methods

A protocol (unpublished) was designed following the recommendations of the Cochrane collaboration for systematic reviews and the PRISMA guide (Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyzes) for the reporting of the results was followed¹³.

Eligibility criteria

Clinical trials with and without random allocation evaluating the regimen of 0.5 mg/kg/day for 7 or 14 days in participants diagnosed with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria and follow-up longer than 28 days. The main outcome was the cumulative incidence of recurrences after a 28-day follow-up since the first dose, defined as a P. vivax infection in patients who previously had an adequate clinical response to the treatment. As a secondary outcome, the treatment adverse events (rash, dizziness, headache, abdominal pain, nausea, jaundice, hemoglobin, hemoglobinuria, agranulocytosis, leocopenia, cyanosis, hypertension, cardiac arrhythmia) were assessed.

Searching strategy

Selection of studies

The eligibility of studies was assessed independently by two of the three authors of a standardized form. Disagreements were resolved by consensus between the three authors. In the screening phase, the titles and abstracts were revised, in a second phase, the full articles were reviewed, and finally the information extraction and quality assessment of the studies included was performed.

Data extraction

The information in each study was extracted by one author and subsequently confirmed by a second one; the information included was the year of publication, the place where the study was conducted (country and region), the number of arms, the intervention and the comparison group, the adjustment of the PQ dose according to body weight, the diagnosis test used for detect recurrence, if the follow-up of participants took place in an endemic area, the population type, if the parasitaemia was or was not an inclusion criterion, the performance of tests for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), the simultaneous or non-simultaneous administration of the PQ and the blood schizonticide, the PQ daily dose, the treatment time, the total dose, the treatment supervision, the basal characteristics (age and gender), the number of participants, the length of follow-up, the absolute frequency of recurrences, the cumulative incidence of recurrence and the adverse events associated with the PQ treatment.

Risk of bias in individual studies

In order to assess the quality of the studies, the approach proposed by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) group was followed¹⁴. For this, the Cochrane tool was used, which includes a checklist with which the authors of this systematic review assessed, the random sequence generation, the allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, the blinding of outcome assessment, the incomplete outcome data and the selective reporting of outcomes.

Summary measures and synthesis of results

The cumulative incidence of recurrences (number of events during the follow-up period of all participants) was used as a summary measure for individual studies; besides, the relative risks ratio (RR) and their respective confidence intervals by 95% (95% CI) were calculated for studies that made the comparison with the standard regimen. For the primary objective, comparing the efficacy and safety of PQ 0.5 mg/kg/day for 7 days with the standard regimen, a meta-analysis of fixed effects was performed, with which the overall RR and its 95% CI was estimated. For the secondary objective, comparing the PQ regimen of 0.5 mg/kg/day for 14 days with the standard regimen, a meta-analysis could not be performed because only one study was found. The assessment of the heterogeneity of the results between studies was performed with the Chi Square test with a p <0.10 value indicating heterogeneity, and the I² statistic assuming significant heterogeneity if it was higher than 20%.

Results

A total of 626 articles were identified in the electronic databases, 213 in MEDLINE, 344 in EMBASE, 49 in LILACS, 28 in SCIELO, 103 in CENTRAL of Cochrane and 33 in Clinical Trials; and, additionally, an article was identified in other sources. 376 were duplicated and 251 articles were screened, out of which 229 were excluded. Twenty-three articles were fully read for review in the second phase, out of which 9 clinical trials met with the eligibility criteria; 7 studies for the qualitative systematic review of the primary objective^15-21, out of these, 4 studies made a comparison with the standard regimen and were included in the meta-analysis^15,17,19,20, the other 3 did not compare with the standard regimen^16,18,21. Three studies for the secondary objective were identified^19,22,23, one of which was also included in the primary objective; only one study made a comparison with the standard regimen¹⁹, therefore, no studies for the quantitative synthesis of this objective were included (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Flowchart of studies included. The results of the search process and the selection of studies to be included in this revision are shown.

Characteristics of the studies

Table 1 shows the main characteristics of the studies. Three studies were conducted in Brazil^15,16,18, two in Peru^17,20 one in Colombia²¹ one in India¹⁹ one in Pakistan²² and one in Indonesia²³. Only one study was conducted in a non-endemic region where reinfection during the follow-up was not possible²³. The length of follow-up was variable with an average of 200 days (60-365 range).

Table 1. Characteristics of the studies included. The main characteristics of the studies regarding the place where they were conducted, the inclusion criteria for participants and the follow-up to assess recurrences is shown*.

Region	Ref	Blood schizonticide + Intervention/comparison	Dose adjustment for body weight greater than 60 kg	Endemic region	Population	Inclusion criteria parasitemia diagnosis day (# parasites/µL)	G6PDH test before administering PQ	Simultaneous treatment blood schizonticide and PQ	Supervision treatment	Genotyping for classification recurrences (relapse or reinfection)
America	18 Brazil	CQ 10 mg/kg single dose + PQ 0.5 mg/kg/day 7 days	Not applicable	Yes	Community, children between 0 and 15 yrs old	No	No	Not specified	Not specified	No
	15 Brazil	CQ 25 mg/kg 3 days + PQ 0.25 mg/kg/day 14 days	Not specified	Yes	Community, age >12 yrs	No	Not specified	Not specified	Yes	No
		CQ 10 mg/kg single dose + PQ 0.5 mg/kg/day 7 days						Not specified	Yes
	20 ]]> Peru	CQ 25 mg/Kg + PQ 0.25 mg/kg/day 14 days	Not specified	Yes	Community, age >12 yrs	No	Not specified	Yes	Yes	No
		CQ 25 mg/Kg + PQ 0.5 mg/kg/day 7 days							Yes
	16 Brazil	AS 50 mg 0h and 12h + PQ 30 mg/d 7 days	No	Yes	Community, age >14 yrs	No	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	No
		AS 100 mg 0h and 12h + PQ 30 mg/d 7 days
		AS 100 mg 0h and 50 mg 12h + PQ 30 mg/d 7 days
		CQ 600 mg single dose + PQ 30 mg/kg/d 7 days
	21 Colombia	CQ 25 mg/Kg in 3 days + PQ 210 mg in 7 days	Not specified	Yes	Community, children <18 yrs old	Yes; 1,000 or more parasites/µL	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
	17 Perú	CQ 25 mg/kg 3 day + PQ 0.5 mg/kg/day 7 days	Not specified	Yes	Community, age >1 yr	Yes; between 250-100,000 parasites/µL	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
		CQ 25 mg/kg 3 days + PQ 0.25 mg/kg/day 14 days	Not specified	Yes					Yes
Southeast Asian	23 Indonesia	Quinina (10 mg/kg 3 time by day, 7 days) + PQ 30 mg/day 14 days	Yes; maximum 45 mg/day, PQ in participant >70 kg.	No	Soldiers	No	Yes	Yes	Not specified	Not applicable. All recurrences are relapse
		Dihidroartemisinina (120 mg)- piperaquina (960 mg)/day, 3 days + PQ after day 28; 30 mg/day, 14 days						No; PQ after finishing blood schizonticide	Not specified
	19 India	CQ 25 mg/kg 3 days + PQ 15 mg/day, 14 days	Not specified	Yes	Community, age >18 yrs	No	Yes	No, PQ 24 h after last CQ dosage	Yes	Yes
		CQ 25 mg/kg 3 days + PQ 30 mg/day, 7 days
		CQ 25 mg/kg 3 days + PQ 30 mg/day, 14 days
Eastern Mediterranean	22 Pakistan	CQ 25 mg/kg 3 days + PQ 0.5 mg/kg/day, 14 days	Not specified	Yes	Community, age >3 yrs	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
G6PDH, Glucose 6-phosphate deshidrogenase, PQ, Primaquine, CQ, Chloroquine, AS, Artesunate * All diagnosis test were made by microscopy

Clinical trials included a total of 1,996 participants, 1,486 received PQ 0.5 mg/kg/day for 7 days and 510 participants received PQ 0.5 mg/kg/day for 14 days. The participants were recruited from the civilian population in eight studies^15-22 and only one came from the military population²³. In five studies, they conducted the G6PD test before administering of the PQ^17,19,21-23 while others did not provide information about this test^15,16,18,20. In all studies microscopy was used as a diagnostic test for detecting recurrences of P. vivax malaria. Only two studies considered a parasitemia greater than 1,000 parasites/µL²¹ or between 250 and 100,000 parasites/µL as an inclusion criteria¹⁷.

The regimens used to compare the PQ 0.5 mg/Kg/day for 7 or 14 days were heterogeneous; three studies used an arm without PQ for comparison^19,22,23, out of these, two used CQ 25 mg/Kg as blood schizonticide^19,22 and one used artesunate²³; four studies used the standard regimen of PQ for comparison and CQ was also used in them^15,17,19,20, PQ 0.75 mg/Kg/week during 8 weeks was used in another one²², while lower doses of PQ than standard regimen were used in the remaining studies^16,18,21.

The percentage of cumulative incidence of P. vivax malaria recurrences was the primary outcome in all clinical trials included. Eight studies reported the assessment of adverse events to treatment^15-17,19-23 and only one study was unclear whether this outcome was measured or not¹⁸.

Bias risk of the studies

Figure 2a shows the judgment of the authors regarding the items assessed about methodological quality for each of the included studies. Figure 2b summarizes the overall bias risk for all clinical trials, the high risk, low risk or non-specified risk percentage in the study is represented for each item. None of the studies included was blinded to the participants nor considered allocation concealment; therefore, the bias risk for these items is high. A high bias risk in blinding those who evaluated the outcome and in management of losses during the follow-up was also found. The items assessed with the best methodological quality were the sequence generation for treatment assignment and the selective reporting bias of outcomes; the majority of studies generated the sequence through of a random number chart and considered the assessment of other outcomes such as adverse effects to treatment.

Figure 2. Summary of the authors' opinion about the bias risk in the studies included. The bias risk is grouped in seven domains assessing the potential bias sources, for each study, these domains were rated as low bias risk (green), high bias risk (red) or unknown bias risk (yellow) a) Bias risk of the individual studies for each item assessed. b) Global bias risk, presented as percentage of all the studies.

Results of individual studies

Table 2 shows the results for each study. A cumulative recurrence incidence mean of 8.41% (0% to 22.80% range) was found for PQ 0.5 mg/Kg/day for 7 days^15-21 in a follow-up period from 90 to 210 days; and 8.38% (1.90% to 19.40% range) was found for PQ 0.5 mg/Kg/day for 14 days from 180 to 365 days. For clinical trials comparing with the standard regimen, the recurrence mean was 7.58% (0 to 10.20% range) for PQ for 7 days, 6.60% for PQ for 14 days and 8.32% (5.00% to 13.50% range) for the standard regimen.

Synthesis of results

Figure 3. Meta-analysis results. The diagram represents the number of participants and the total number of events (recurrences) for the group receiving the primaquine 0.5 mg/Kg/day for 7 days and for the group receiving the primaquine 0.25 mg/Kg/day for 14 days (standard regimen). The ratio relative risks (RR) are shown with their respective confidence intervals (IC 95%) and the meta-analysis performed.

For the secondary objective, only one study compared PQ 0.5 mg/Kg/day for 14 days with the standard regimen¹⁹, the RR of recurrence after 180-day follow-up was 0.846 (95% CI= 0.484-1.477). It was not possible to perform a meta-analysis.

Discussion

A priority for the control and elimination of malaria in the world is having an effective treatment to prevent P. vivax relapses²⁴ Some previous systematic reviews have compared the therapeutic efficacy of the standard PQ regimen (0.25 mg/Kg/day for 14 days) mostly used to prevent recurrences of P. vivax malaria with other regimens. Including studies until 2012, they have shown that the total doses lower than the standard regimen have lower efficacy^10,11,25; however, none of the previous systematic revisions have focused on evaluating the effectiveness of both PQ regimens currently used in the world as an alternative to improve efficiency or adherence to the standard PQ regimen (0.5 mg/Kg/day for 7 and 0.5 mg/Kg/day for 14 days); therefore, this systematic revision has addressed this comparison.

We only included trials with a follow-up longer than 28 days, we identified four clinical trials that compared the standard PQ regimen with the PQ regimen of 0.5 mg/Kg/day for 7 days, and only one study comparing with the PQ regimen of 0.5 mg/Kg/day for 14 days. Additionally, we identified 5 clinical trials where one of these two alternative regimens was assessed, but without the comparison with the standard regimen. This systematic review could omit other studies, because here we only consider some of the search sources different from electronic databases (European Open Grey, reference search in the clinical trials registry and search some reports of academic events,) but the search for abstracts in other malaria-related conferences and contact with investigators to try to identify other unpublished or ongoing studies was not included.

Considering that recurrences can occur in less than 28 days after the primary episode^3-5, it is possible that some studies were omitted; however, we limit the systematic revision of studies with a follow-up longer than 28 days since most treatment regimens used for P. vivax malaria use at least one long half-life blood schizontocidal such as chloroquine; and generally the therapeutic response to them is assessed during the first post-treatment month^7,8,26; therefore we did not include these studies in order to avoid an overestimation of the incidence of recurrences that could be caused by a recrudescence of blood parasites (blood schizonticide therapeutic failure) and not due to the lack PQ efficacy.

We observed a meann of 8.38% of recurrence incidence for the regime which doubles the total dose of PQ, i.e. 0.5/mg/Kg/day for 14 days; this value was similar to the mean for the standard regimen as reported in a previous systematic revision (9.9%)¹¹; and it is even apparently equal to the mean found for the PQ regimen of 0.5 mg/Kg/day for 7 days (8.4%). We attribute these results to the heterogeneity between studies, although the Chi² and I² statistical test did not show such heterogeneity possibly due to the lack of power, important differences were found regarding the length of follow-up, the time when the study was conducted, the blood schizontocides used, in addition to the deficiencies in the conduction of studies that cast doubt on the validity of the comparisons.

Another source of heterogeneity in the results could be the origin of the participants, since there are different patterns of relapse by geographic region^3-5; we include clinical trials from three different geographical regions (The Americas, Southeast Asia and Eastern Mediterranean) for which it has been reported that the most common relapse pattern is that one of short intervals; therefore, we believe that the recurrence incidence found for the PQ in this systematic revision may be higher than that one that might be found in other regions such as Europe or Africa where the pattern of late relapse is more common³. Although there is insufficient knowledge about the distribution of P. vivax strains according to the relapse pattern, there is some evidence of the simultaneous presence of several patterns in the same region^3,27 which may explain the variability found for studies in the region of the Americas included in this revision.

Eight out of the nine clinical trials included in this review assessed adverse effects to treatment, these considered mainly abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, itching, dizziness, epigastric pain, hemolysis and methamoglobinemia, which are the major side effects for the PQ⁷ . Some studies possibly did not provide further details of adverse events to treatment because of its low frequency in patients with normal activity of the G6PD enzyme, which was one of the inclusion criteria to administer the PQ in most of the studies included.

During the conduction of this systematic revision we identified 4 prospective observational studies evaluating PQ regimens of our concern^28-31. One study evaluated the efficacy of the PQ regimen 0.5 mg/Kg/day for 14 days using atovaquone-proguanil as blood schizonticide²⁹; in this study a recurrence incidence by 5% in 84 days was reported, similar to what we found in clinical trials with this PQ regimen. Three observational studies for the PQ regimen of 0.5 mg/Kg/day for 7 days plus a CQ regimen of 25 mg/Kg during 3 days^28,30,31, which showed conflicting clinical trials included in this review were found; the recurrence incidence for these was between 26% and 76% with a follow-up between 180 and 720 days. This large difference, besides from being explained by methodological limitations and lack of uniformity in follow-up time, they are explained by differences in the method for detecting recurrences; 2 observational studies included a molecular diagnosis (PCR) to assess the outcome^28,31, because this technique has a detection limit lower than that of microscopy^{32, 33}, sub-microscopic and asymptomatic recurrences were found in these studies, showing reduced efficacy of PQ.

Only two studies looked at the genetic characterization of recurrences to be classified as relapses or reinfections^17,19 in both studies, less than 50% of recurrences were classified as relapses. Although the methods selected for genotyping have limitations, this finding is highlighted to emphasize the importance of including the genetic characterization of P. vivax in the studies intending to assess recurrences, since it could contribute to a better approach to the therapeutic efficacy of PQ.

Conclusion

The PQ regimen of 0.5 mg/Kg/day for 7 or 14 days is currently used in some countries instead of the standard treatment to prevent P. vivax relapses, though here it was found that apparently the 7-day regimen is not inferior than the standard one, this systematic revision suggests that given the small number of clinical trials reported and methodological limitations thereof, there is insufficient evidence to determine which PQ regimen used as first-line treatment for P. vivax in the world has the best efficacy and safety in preventing relapses. It is necessary to conduct clinical trials with a high methodological quality to compare these regimens and thus have therapeutic alternatives to prevent relapses, which may guide changes in treatment protocols for P. vivax malaria.

Acknowledgements:

The authors wish to thank the professors from the University of Antioquia Dr. Jorge Donado, Dr. Carlos Rojas and Dr. Silvia Blair for the comments on this paper.

Funding:

This work was funded by the University of Antioquia, Colombia through its Committee for Research Development (Spanish acronym CODI), Malaria Group, School of Medicine and Epidemiology Group, National School of Public Health.

Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

1. Guerra CA, Howes RE, Patil AP, Gething PW, Van Boeckel TP, Temperley WH, et al. The international limits and population at risk of Plasmodium vivax transmission in 2009. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010; 4(8): e774.         [ Links ]

2. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2013. 2014. Available from: http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world_malaria_report_2013/report/en/.         [ Links ]

3. White NJ. Determinants of relapse periodicity in Plasmodium vivax malaria. Malar J. 2011; 10: 297.         [ Links ]

4. Garnham PC, Bray RS, Bruce-Chwatt LJ, Draper CC, Killick-Kendrick R, Sergiev PG, et al. A strain of Plasmodium vivax characterized by prolonged incubation: morphological and biological characteristics. Bull World Health Organ. 1975; 52(1): 21-32.         [ Links ]

5. Krotoski WA, Garnham PC, Cogswell FB, Collins WE, Bray RS, Gwasz RW, et al. Observations on early and late post-sporozoite tissue stages in primate malaria. IV. Pre-erythrocytic schizonts and/or hypnozoites of Chesson and North Korean strains of Plasmodium vivax in the chimpanzee. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1986; 35(2): 263-74.         [ Links ]

6. Baird JK. Malaria caused by Plasmodium vivax: recurrent, difficult to treat, disabling, and threatening to life--the infectious bite preempts these hazards. Pathog Glob Health. 2013; 107(8): 475-9.         [ Links ]

7. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. 2015. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/162441/1/9789241549127_eng.pdf.         [ Links ]

8. World Health Organization. Methods for surveillance of antimalarial drug efficacy. 2009. Available from:http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/9789241597531/en/.         [ Links ]

9. Baird JK. Resistance to therapies for infection by Plasmodium vivax. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009; 22(3): 508-34.         [ Links ]

10. Galappaththy GN, Tharyan P, Kirubakaran R. Primaquine for preventing relapse in people with Plasmodium vivax malaria treated with chloroquine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 10: CD004389.         [ Links ]

11. John GK, Douglas NM, von Seidlein L, Nosten F, Baird JK, White NJ, et al. Primaquine radical cure of Plasmodium vivax: a critical review of the literature. Malar J. 2012;11:280-280.         [ Links ]

12. Hill DR, Baird JK, Parise ME, Lewis LS, Ryan ET, Magill AJ. Primaquine: report from CDC expert meeting on malaria chemoprophylaxis I. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75(3):402-15.         [ Links ]

13. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264-9.         [ Links ]

14. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias) J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64(4): 407-15.         [ Links ]

15. Abdon NP, Pinto AY, das Silva Rdo S , de Souza JM. Assessment of the response to reduced treatment schemes for vivax malaria. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2001; 34(4): 343-8.         [ Links ]

16. da Silva Rdo S , Pinto AY, Calvosa VS , de Souza JM . Short course schemes for vivax malaria treatment. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2003; 36(2): 235-9.         [ Links ]

17. Durand S, Cabezas C, Lescano AG, Galvez M, Gutierrez S, Arrospide N, et al. Efficacy of three different regimens of primaquine for the prevention of relapses of Plasmodium vivax malaria in the Amazon Basin of Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014; 91(1): 18-26.         [ Links ]

18. Pinto AY, Ventura AM, Calvosa VS, Silva Filho MG, Santos MA, Silva RS, et al. Clinical efficacy of four schemes for vivax malaria treatment in children. J Pediatr (Rio J) 1998; 74(3): 222-7.         [ Links ]

19. Rajgor DD, Gogtay NJ, Kadam VS, Kocharekar MM, Parulekar MS, Dalvi SS, et al. Antirelapse Efficacy of Various Primaquine Regimens for Plasmodium vivax. Malar Res Treat. 2014; 2014: 347018.         [ Links ]

20. Solari-Soto L, Soto-Tarazona A, Mendoza-Requena D, Llanos-Cuentas A. Ensayo clínico del tratamiento de la malaria vivax con esquema acortado de primaquina comparado con el esquema tradicional. Rev Soc Peru Med Intern. 2002; 15(4): 197-9.         [ Links ]

21. Carmona-Fonseca J. Malaria vivax en niños: recurrencias con dosis total estándar de primaquina administrada durante 3 frente a 7 días. Iatreia. 2010; 23: 10-20.         [ Links ]

22. Leslie T, Mayan I, Mohammed N, Erasmus P, Kolaczinski J, Whitty CJ, et al. A randomised trial of an eight-week, once weekly primaquine regimen to prevent relapse of Plasmodium vivax in Northwest Frontier Province, Pakistan. PloS One. 2008; 3(8): e2861.         [ Links ]

23. Sutanto I, Tjahjono B, Basri H, Taylor WR, Putri FA, Meilia RA, et al. Randomized, open-label trial of primaquine against vivax malaria relapse in Indonesia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57(3): 1128-35.         [ Links ]

24. Diagana TT. Supporting malaria elimination with 21st century antimalarial agent drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2015; 20(10): 1265-70.         [ Links ]

25. Carmona-Fonseca J. Primaquine and relapses of Plasmodium vivax. Meta analysis of controlled clinical trials. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2015; 18(1): 174-93.         [ Links ]

26. World Health Organization. Methods and techniques for assessing exposure to antimalarial drugs in clinical field studies. 2010. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44653/1/9789241502061_eng.pdf.         [ Links ]

27. Kim JR, Nandy A, Maji AK, Addy M, Dondorp AM, Day NP, et al. Genotyping of Plasmodium vivax reveals both short and long latency relapse patterns in Kolkata. PloS One. 2012; 7(7): e39645.         [ Links ]

28. Delgado-Ratto C, Soto-Calle VE, Van den Eede P, Gamboa D, Rosas A, Abatih EN, et al. Population structure and spatio-temporal transmission dynamics of Plasmodium vivax after radical cure treatment in a rural village of the Peruvian Amazon. Malar J. 2014; 13: 8.         [ Links ]

29. Looareesuwan S, Wilairatana P, Glanarongran R, Indravijit KA, Supeeranontha L, Chinnapha S, et al. Atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride followed by primaquine for treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria in Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999; 93(6): 637-40.         [ Links ]

30. Orjuela-Sanchez P, da Silva NS, da Silva-Nunes M, Ferreira MU. Recurrent parasitemias and population dynamics of Plasmodium vivax polymorphisms in rural Amazonia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009; 81(6): 961-8.         [ Links ]

31. Van den Eede P, Soto-Calle VE, Delgado C, Gamboa D, Grande T, Rodriguez H. Plasmodium vivax sub-patent infections after radical treatment are common in Peruvian patients: results of a 1-year prospective cohort study. PloS One. 2011; 6(1): e16257.         [ Links ]

32. Harris I, Sharrock WW, Bain LM, Gray KA, Bobogare A, Boaz L, et al. A large proportion of asymptomatic Plasmodium infections with low and sub-microscopic parasite densities in the low transmission setting of Temotu Province, Solomon Islands: challenges for malaria diagnostics in an elimination setting. Malar J. 2010; 9: 254.         [ Links ]

33. Okell LC, Bousema T, Griffin JT, Ouedraogo AL, Ghani AC, Drakeley CJ. Factors determining the occurrence of submicroscopic malaria infections and their relevance for control. Nat Commun. 2012; 3: 1237.         [ Links ]