<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1692-2530</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Opinión Jurídica]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Opin. jurid.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1692-2530</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de Medellín]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1692-25302020000100115</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22395/ojum.v19n38a6</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Segurança e justiça: o acordo de não persecução penal e sua compatibilidade com o sistema acusatório]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Seguridad y justicia: el acuerdo de no persecución penal y su compatibilidad con el sistema acusatorio]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Security and Justice: the Non-Criminal Prosecution Agreement and its Compatibility with the Prosecuting System]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Langroiva Pereira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Claudio José]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Girade Parise]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bruno]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Católica de São Paulo  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>38</numero>
<fpage>115</fpage>
<lpage>135</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1692-25302020000100115&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1692-25302020000100115&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1692-25302020000100115&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[RESUMO A segurança pública envolve diretamente a segurança jurídica e a segurança das instituições democráticas. A partir do reconhecimento pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal brasileiro da constitucionalidade de investigações penais serem realizadas diretamente pelo Ministério Público, sem a presidência da autoridade policial, o Conselho Nacional do Ministério Público cumpriu determinação de regulamentar a questão, em âmbito institucional, quando editou a Resolução 181, de 7 de agosto de 2017. Além da regulamentação da investigação, a Resolução também prevê em seu artigo 18 o &#8220;acordo de não persecução penal&#8221;. Diante desse cenário, o artigo tem como objetivo geral avaliar a Resolução e o referido instituto. Para isso, toma como premissas a Constituição Federal brasileira, o sistema acusatório, os princípios da legalidade e da reserva legal. Como objetivo específico, o texto pretende analisá-los sob a ótica do devido processo legal (penal) e dos direitos e garantias fundamentais do cidadão no Estado Democrático de Direito brasileiro. A questão que impulsiona a investigação, ligada diretamente à segurança jurídica e à segurança das instituições democráticas, está em saber se ao propor uma modificação no Processo Penal por meio de Resolução, com acordos realizados antes da denúncia e com contrapartidas assemelhadas à pena, o órgão ministerial obedeceu ao sistema processual vigente. O estudo utiliza como método, predominantemente, a revisão bibliográfica e procura traçar um diálogo entre autores contemporâneos sobre o tema em questão.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN La seguridad pública implica directamente la seguridad jurídica y la seguridad de las instituciones democráticas. Desde el reconocimiento por parte de la Corte Suprema Federal de Brasil de la constitucionalidad de las investigaciones penales que se llevan a cabo directamente por el Ministerio Público, sin la presidencia de la autoridad policial, el Consejo Nacional del Servicio de Fiscalía Pública cumplió con la determinación de regular el problema, a nivel institucional, al emitir la Resolución 181, del 7 de agosto de 2017. Además de la regulación de la investigación, la Resolución también establece en su artículo 18 el &#8220;acuerdo de no persecución penal&#8221;. Ante este escenario, el objetivo general del artículo es evaluar la Resolución y ese instituto. Para ello, toma como premisas la Constitución Federal brasileña, el sistema acusatorio, los principios de legalidad y la reserva legal. Como objetivo específico, el texto pretende analizarlos desde la perspectiva del debido proceso (penal) y los derechos y garantías fundamentales del ciudadano en el Estado de Derecho Democrático brasileño. El tema que impulsa la investigación, directamente relacionado con la seguridad jurídica y la seguridad de las instituciones democráticas, es saber si al proponer una modificación del Procedimiento Penal mediante resolución, con acuerdos realizados antes de la denuncia y con contrapartes similares a la pena, la Fiscalia siguió el sistema procesal actual. El estudio utiliza como método, predominantemente, la revisión de la literatura, y busca establecer un diálogo entre autores contemporáneos sobre el tema en cuestión.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT Public safety and security directly involve both legal certainty and the security of democratic institutions. Since the acknowledgement by the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court of the constitutionality of criminal investigations being carried out directly by the Public Prosecution Service, without police direction, the National Council of the Public Prosecution Service complied with the determination to regulate the matter, at institutional level, issuing the Resolution 181, of August 7, 2017. Further to the regulation of the investigation, the Resolution also provides in its article 18 the &#8220;non-criminal prosecution agreement&#8221;. Given this scenario, the main aim of this paper is to assess the Resolution and the referred institute, taking as its premises the Brazilian Federal Constitution, the accusatorial system, the principles of legality and the legal reserve. As a specific objective, the article seeks to analyze those from the perspective of proper (criminal) legal proceedings, as well as the fundamental rights and guarantees of the citizen in the Brazilian Democratic State of Law. The issue that drives the investigation, directly anchored to the legal certainty and the security of democratic institutions, is whether by proposing an alteration of the Criminal Procedure through Resolution - with agreements made before the denunciation and with counterparts similar to the penalty - the ministerial body has conformed to the current procedural system. The prevailing methodology of this research was a literature review, seeking to open a dialogue between contemporary authors on the subject matter.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[segurança pública]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[justiça penal negociada]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[justiça transacional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[sistema acusatório]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[acordo de não persecução penal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Ministério Público]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[princípio da legalidade]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[princípio da obrigatoriedade]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[princípio da oportunidade]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[jurisdicionalidade]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[seguridad pública]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[justicia penal negociada]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[justicia transicional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[sistema acusatorio]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[acuerdo de no persecución penal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[fiscalía]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[principio de legalidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[principio de obligación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[principio de oportunidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[jurisdiccionalidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[public safety and security]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[negotiated criminal justice]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[transitional justice]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[accusatory system]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[non-criminal prosecution agreement]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Public Ministry]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[principle of legality]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[principle of obligation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[opportunity principle]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Andrade]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brandalise]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. D. S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Observações preliminares sobre o acordo de não persecução penal: da inconstitucionalidade à inconsistência argumentativa]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFRGS]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<page-range>240-61</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Porto Alegre ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Araújo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. A. D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nunes Junior]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V. S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Curso de direito constitucional]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<edition>22</edition>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora Verbatim]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Badaró]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. H. R. I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Processo penal]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<edition>2</edition>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Camus]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[O homem revoltado]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<edition>6</edition>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Record]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Canario]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Em parecer, MPF defende prisões preventivas para forçar réus a confessar]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Canotilho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brandão]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Colaboração premiada e auxílio judiciário em matéria penal: a ordem pública como obstáculo à cooperação com à operação Lava Jato]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Legislação e de Jurisprudência]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>4000</volume>
<page-range>17-38</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caparelli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vasconcellos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V. G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Notas sobre a perene crise do princípio da obrigatoriedade da ação penal no ordenamento jurídico italiano]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<page-range>118-49</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Casara]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mitologia processual penal]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Saraiva]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Casara]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Melchior]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Teoria do processo penal brasileiro: dogmática e crítica]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Lumen Juris]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Conselho Nacional do Ministério Público</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Procedimento de Estudos e Pesquisas 01. Pronunciamento Final em Procedimento de Estudos]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Costa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. D. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Um olhar cruzado entre a Constituição e o processo penal. In: A justiça dos dois lados do Atlântico - teoria e prática do processo criminal em Portugal e nos Estados Unidos da América]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Coutinho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. N. de M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ignorando o passado, processo penal brasileiro revive Auflockerung nazista]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Couture]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Antonio Fabris]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Sergio]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Os mandamentos do advogado]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<edition>3</edition>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Departamento Penitenciário Nacional, Depen</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Levantamento Nacional, de informações Penitenciárias]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eymerich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. J. L. da]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Manual dos inquisitores - Directorium Inquisitorum]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Rosa dos Tempos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferrajoli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Choukr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F. H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Direito e razão: a teoria do garantismo penal]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[RT]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferreira da Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[O plea bargain e as falsas confissões: uma discussão necessária no sistema de justiça criminal]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Boletim IBCCRIM]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>318</volume>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[IBCCRIM]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Figueiredo Dias]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Direito processual penal]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Coimbra Editora]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Granduque]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jesus]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Albert Camus: a justiça entre o avesso e o direito]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[LiberArs]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lopes Junior]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Direito processual penal]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<edition>11</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Saraiva]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maldonado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chorres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El Estado en la gestión del conflicto: la reforma del proceso penal en Latinoamérica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Opinión Jurídica]]></source>
<year></year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>17</numero>
<issue>17</issue>
<page-range>57-70</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morais da Rosa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lopes Jr.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Saldão penal e a popularização da lógica da colaboração pelo CNMP]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>O Globo</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Preso em São Paulo, Tommaso Buscetta delatou mais de 300 mafiosos italianos]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pereira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. J. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Princípio da oportunidade de justiça penal negociada]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Juarez de Oliveira]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pereira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. J. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Almeida]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Segurança e risco em instituições democráticas, segurança pública, instituições democráticas e seus elementos históricos, políticos e econômicos]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Quartier Latin]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Prado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Sistema acusatório. A conformidade constitucional das leis processuais penais]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<edition>3</edition>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora Lumen Juris]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roxin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Derecho procesal penal]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editores Del Puerto]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sanguiné]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Clamor público como fundamento da prisão preventiva]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shecaira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Estudos criminais em homenagem a Evandro Lins e Silva (criminalista do século)]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<page-range>257-96</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora Método]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A idéia de justiça]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Companhia das Letras]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schunemann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Estudos de direito penal, direito processual penal e filosofia do direito]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>The New York Times</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Alaska ending plea bargaing to raise confidence in justice]]></source>
<year>1975</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vasconcellos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V. G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Barganha e justiça criminal negocial: análise das tendências de expansão dos espaços de consenso no processo penal brasileiro]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<edition>2</edition>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora D´Placido]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
