<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1794-5887</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Co-herencia]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Co-herencia]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1794-5887</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Departamento de Humanidades de la Universidad EAFIT]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1794-58872020000100225</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.8</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[What Optimistic Responses to Deep Disagreement get Right (and Wrong)]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Qué respuestas optimistas al desacuerdo profundo generan buenos (y malos) efectos]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aikin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Scott F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Vanderbilt University  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>USA</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>17</volume>
<numero>32</numero>
<fpage>225</fpage>
<lpage>238</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1794-58872020000100225&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1794-58872020000100225&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1794-58872020000100225&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract In this paper, I argue for three theses. First, that the problem of Deep Disagreement is usefully understood as an instance of the skeptical Problem of the Criterion. Second, there are structural similarities between proposed optimistic answers to deep disagreement and the problem of the criterion. Third, in light of these similarities, there are both good and bad consequences for proposed solutions to the problem of deep disagreement.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen El presente artículo presenta tres tesis. En primer lugar, plantea que el problema del desacuerdo profundo se entiende, convenientemente, como un ejemplo del problema del criterio desde la óptica del escepticismo. En segundo lugar, existen similitudes estructurales entre las respuestas optimistas que se proponen con respecto al desacuerdo profundo y al problema del criterio. Y, en tercer lugar, ante dichas similitudes, las soluciones que se proponen frente al problema del desacuerdo profundo generan tanto buenas como malas consecuencias.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Deep disagreement]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[skepticism]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[problem of the criterion]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[argumentation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Desacuerdo profundo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[escepticismo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[problema del criterio]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[argumentación]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aikin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Deep Disagreement and the Problem of the Criterion]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Topoi]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<month>a</month>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aikin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Dialecticality and Deep Disagreement]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Symposion]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<month>b</month>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>173-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aikin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Deep Disagreement, the Dark Enlightenment, and the Rhetoric of the Red Pill]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Journal of Applied Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>420-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Amico]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Problem of the Criterion]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Rowman &amp; Littlefield]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chisholm]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Problem of the Criterion]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marquette University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cling]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Epistemic Regress Problem, The Problem of the Criterion, and the Value of Reasons]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Metaphilosophy]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>161-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davson-Galle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Arguing, Arguments, and Deep Disagreements]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Informal Logic]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>2/3</numero>
<issue>2/3</issue>
<page-range>147-56</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duran]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Levels of Depth in Deep Disagreement]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[OSSA Conference Archive]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>109</volume>
<page-range>1-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fogelin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Logic of Deep Disagreements]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Informal Logic]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>3-11</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Godden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brenner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W. H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Wittgenstein and the Logic of Deep Disagreement]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Diego Portales, Centro de Estudios de la Argumentación y el Razonamiento]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lugg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Deep Disagreement and Informal Logic: No Cause for Alarm]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Informal Logic]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>47-51</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Memedi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Resolving Deep Disagreement]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[OSSA Conference Archive]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>108</volume>
<page-range>1-10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Empiricus]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Sextus]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bury]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Outlines of Pyrrhonism]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Prometheus Books]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Beyond Argument: A Hegelian Approach to Deep Disagreement]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Symposion]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<month>)</month>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>181-95</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
