<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1794-6190</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Earth Sciences Research Journal]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Earth Sci. Res. J.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1794-6190</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional de Colombia]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1794-61902005000100007</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[ELASTIC APPROACH TO REMOVE SURFICIAL WAVES FROM SHOT GATHERS]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MALAVER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LUIS LEONARDO]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MONTES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LUIS ALFREDO]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Colombia Research Group in Geophysics ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Colombia  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>65</fpage>
<lpage>69</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1794-61902005000100007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1794-61902005000100007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1794-61902005000100007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[This paper presents a deterministic two-step approach for the attenuation of ground-roll: modeling the ground-roll response and subtracting it from the recorded shot gather. The first step requires an elastic model of the shallow subsurface, which is created by estimating the p-wave velocity from the first arrivals or uphole times and the s-wave velocity from the ground-roll itself. A finite difference program simulates the elastic wave propagation in the model, providing both an acoustic seismogram and elastic one which contains the ground-roll and also the acoustic response. The provided seismograms are numerically subtracted trace by trace to furnish the isolated ground-roll. The method was applied to records from a Colombian foothill area . These records are contaminated with strong, dispersive, spatially aliased ground-roll that overwhelms the subsurface reflections. The results show that the method provides a better attenuation of ground-roll than those standard techniques such as low-cut frequency filters or f-k filtering, but it does so without sacrificing the low frequency component of data and without causing any distortion in seismic signal .]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[En este artículo se presenta un esquema determinístico de atenuación de ondas superficiales ( Ground - roll ) que consta de dos pasos: modelamiento elástico del Ground - roll y substracción de este ruido del registro sísmico original. El primer paso requiere un modelo elástico de la capa somera, el cual se obtiene a partir de las velocidades de la ondas acústica (onda P) y de cizalla (onda S), estimables a partir de los primeros arribos y del ground - roll presente en el registro. Un programa simula la propagación de la onda elástica en el modelo generando un sismograma acústico y otro elástico que contiene tanto el Ground - roll como la respuesta acústica. La substracción numérica traza a traza entre estos sismogramas suministra el ground - roll . La metodología se aplicó a registros del piedemonte Colombiano logrando una mejor atenuación del Ground - roll que la obtenida por métodos convencionales como el uso de filtros de bajas frecuencias o del dominio f-k. Los resultados muestran que la atenuación del Ground - roll se logra sin afectar las bajas frecuencias propias de los datos y sin distorsionar la señal sísmica de interés .]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Ground roll]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[wave equation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[finite differences]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[modeling]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[filters]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Ground roll]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Ecuación de Onda]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Diferencias Finitas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Modelamiento]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[filtros]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  <font size="2" face="verdana">     <p><b><font size="4">    <center>ELASTIC APPROACH TO REMOVE SURFICIAL WAVES FROM SHOT GATHERS</center></font></b></p>     <p>LUIS LEONARDO MALAVER<sup>1</sup> and LUIS ALFREDO MONTES<sup>2</sup></p>     <p><sup>1</sup>Research Group in Geophysics, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, e-mail: <a href="mailto:llmalaverc@unal.edu.co">llmalaverc@unal.edu.co</a>    <br> <sup>2</sup>Associate profesor, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, e-mail: <a href="mailto:lamontesv@unal.edu.co">lamontesv@unal.edu.co</a></p> <hr size="1">     <p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p>     <p>This paper presents a deterministic two-step approach for the attenuation of ground-roll: modeling the ground-roll response and   subtracting it from the recorded shot gather. The first step requires an elastic model of the shallow subsurface, which is created by   estimating the p-wave velocity from the first arrivals or uphole times and the s-wave velocity from the ground-roll itself. A finite   difference program simulates the elastic wave propagation in the model, providing both an acoustic seismogram and elastic one which   contains the ground-roll and also the acoustic response. The provided seismograms are numerically subtracted trace by trace to furnish   the isolated ground-roll. The method was applied to records from a Colombian foothill area. These records are contaminated with   strong, dispersive, spatially aliased ground-roll that overwhelms the subsurface reflections. The results show that the method provides a   better attenuation of ground-roll than those standard techniques such as low-cut frequency filters or f-k filtering, but it does so without sacrificing the low frequency component of data and without causing any distortion in seismic signal.</p>     <p><b>Key Words:</b> Ground roll, wave equation, finite differences, modeling, filters.</p> <hr size="1">     <p><b>RESUMEN</b></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>En este art&iacute;culo se presenta un esquema determin&iacute;stico de atenuaci&oacute;n de ondas superficiales (Ground-roll) que consta de dos pasos:   modelamiento el&aacute;stico del Ground-roll y substracci&oacute;n de este ruido del registro s&iacute;smico original. El primer paso requiere un modelo   el&aacute;stico de la capa somera, el cual se obtiene a partir de las velocidades de la ondas ac&uacute;stica (onda P) y de cizalla (onda S), estimables   a partir de los primeros arribos y del ground-roll presente en el registro. Un programa simula la propagaci&oacute;n de la onda el&aacute;stica en el   modelo generando un sismograma ac&uacute;stico y otro el&aacute;stico que contiene tanto el Ground-roll como la respuesta ac&uacute;stica. La substracci&oacute;n   num&eacute;rica traza a traza entre estos sismogramas suministra el ground-roll. La metodolog&iacute;a se aplic&oacute; a registros del piedemonte Colombiano   logrando una mejor atenuaci&oacute;n del Ground-roll que la obtenida por m&eacute;todos convencionales como el uso de filtros de bajas frecuencias o   del dominio f-k. Los resultados muestran que la atenuaci&oacute;n del Ground-roll se logra sin afectar las bajas frecuencias propias de los datos y sin distorsionar la se&ntilde;al s&iacute;smica de inter&eacute;s.</p>     <p><b>Palabras clave:</b> Ground roll, Ecuaci&oacute;n de Onda, Diferencias Finitas, Modelamiento, filtros.</p> <hr size="1">     <p><b>INTRODUCTION</b></p>     <p>Land seismic data is commonly contaminated with strong coherent   noise such as multiples, ground-roll, converted waves, etc. This   noise interferes and masks the depth subsurface signal in seismic   gathers (Linville, A., &amp; Meck, R., 1995). Near surface lateral   velocity variations, in particular, create strong dispersive surface   waves that overwhelm the useful information in a shot gather.   Band pass and f-k filters are routinely applied in seismic data   processing to remove coherent noise while attempting to preserve   the signal amplitude and phase. These methods are based on   the possibility of separating the signal and noise based on their   distinguishing characteristics such as frequency content (bandpass   filter) or apparent moveout (f-k filtering and radon transform) (Yilmaz, 1991).</p>     <p>Other techniques developed to reduce the effects of the ground-roll   in the seismic records exploit their shallow penetration into the   ground such as the so-called associated deep filtering (McMechan   and Sun, 1991). In this method the energy of the guided wave is   separated from the reflections of the deep horizons by downward   extrapolation in time to a depth below which the ground-roll is   no longer present, followed by a mute of the shallow events (the   ground-roll). This technique can be effective, but can also introduce   distortions in the wavefield if an appropriate sampling is not used   and it is difficult to extent to 3D data (Ernst et al., 2002).   In the frequency&ndash;wavenumber domain (f-k) all linear events with   a same apparent velocity are mapped to a line with the same slope.   Under normal conditions the reflections of the deep horizons are   located in the high-velocity region and the surface waves in the   region of low velocity. The surface waves can be removed in   principle applying a muting window in the region of low velocities   in the f-k domain (Treitel et. al., 1967). Due to the complexity of the   medium conditions, commonly in the hillside areas the separation   between the signal and the noise is not well given, also the levels   of the signal are very low and the performance of these algorithms is limited.</p>     <p>Other methods to discriminate between the reflections of the deep   horizons and the ground&ndash;roll are based on polarization. These   methods need information with multicomponents that are not even   available in many areas. Additionally the state of polarization of   the surface waves can also be irregular (Ernst et al., 1998).   In contrast with the conventional methods of noise suppression   mentioned above, deterministic scheme have been proposed   recently based on wave theory to model the physics of the wave   phenomena we wish to eliminate (Ernst, et. al., 1998; Blonk, et. al.,   1995; Blonk &amp; Herman 1994). Because coherent noise is generated   by a specific, well-known physical mechanism, it is possible to   model if an accurate subsurface model in terms of velocity and   density is available. Thus, ground roll removal becomes a two step   process, i.e., modeling and then subtracting the noise from the shot gather.</p>     <p>In this paper an approach based in noise prediction to remove ground roll from shot gather is presented.</p>     <p><b>P-SV WAVE PROPAGATION MODELING</b></p>     <p>Rather than using the wave equation, which is a second order   hyperbolic system, we start with the elastodynamic equations of a linearly elastic and isotropic medium:</p>     <p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<center><a name="img1"></a><img src="img/revistas/esrj/v9n1/v9n1a07img1.gif"></center></p>     <p>Here, (ux, uz) is the displacement vector, (&tau;xx, &tau;xz, &tau;zz) is the stress   tensor, &rho;(x,z) is the density and the couple &micro;(x,z) &lambda;(x,z) are the   Lam&eacute; coefficients. Introducing the vector velocity the system of equations (1) becomes:</p>     <p>    <center><a name="img2"></a><img src="img/revistas/esrj/v9n1/v9n1a07img2.gif"></center></p>     <p>This is a first order coupled set of equations for velocity and stress   which can be solved numerically. The compressional and shear velocities are respectively given by expressions:</p>     <p>    <center><a name="img3"></a><img src="img/revistas/esrj/v9n1/v9n1a07img3.gif"></center></p>     <p>The medium is assumed in equilibrium initially, i.e. stress and   velocity are set to zero everywhere in the medium at time t=0.   Due to these initial conditions, propagating stress and velocity is   equivalent to propagating time integrated stress&rdquo; and displacement   (Virieux, 1986). A development of finite differences for system (2)   can be seen in Appendix A of Levander (1988), where a second   order in time and fourth order in space O(&#8710;t2, &#8710;h4) were stated, with the stability criterion .&Delta;t&lt;0.606h/a</p>     <p><b>GENERATING THE GROUND ROLL</b></p>     <p>First, a simple 2D model with two layers (see <a href="#fig1">Figure 1</a>) was used to   generate synthetic ground-roll in order to asses the performance of   the proposed approach. Two synthetic records were generated with   a source placed 10 m below free surface: the first one with non   zero shear velocity, simulates a shot in an elastic medium (<a href="#fig2">Figure   2</a>), whereas a second one with zero shear velocity simulates a shot in an acoustic medium (<a href="#fig3">Figure 3</a>).</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>    <center><a name="fig1"></a><img src="img/revistas/esrj/v9n1/v9n1a07fig1.gif"></center></p>     <p>    <center><a name="fig2"></a><img src="img/revistas/esrj/v9n1/v9n1a07fig2.gif"></center></p>     <p>    <center><a name="fig3"></a><img src="img/revistas/esrj/v9n1/v9n1a07fig3.gif"></center></p>     <p>The <a href="#fig2">figure 2</a> shows the non zero shear velocity shot record, where   some events are distinguishable, i.e. direct wave, ground -roll   forming a shadow cone and a primary reflection between 1.4 - 1.6   ms. The reflective horizon is partially covered by the ground-roll   cone and exhibits lack of continuity between the channels 78 -   174. Also, strong numerical dispersion noise and boundary effects   originated when the wave hits the model boundaries are present.   The ghost events caused by the boundary conditions are being investigated in a concurrent project (Ghisays, 2005).</p>     <p><a href="#fig3">Figure 3</a> displays the record generated with zero shear velocity   simulating an acoustic phenomena, it is remarkable the absence of   ground-roll in the record and the better continuity of the reflective event in the interval 1.4 - 1.6 ms and between the channels 78 The synthetic ground-roll-free record was subtracted from the synthetic record (<a href="#fig2">Figure 2</a>) yielding the ground-roll model shown in <a href="#fig4">Figure 4</a>. In real data application this isolated cone is obtained through this procedure from a model estimated from real seismic data.</p>     <p>    <center><a name="fig4"></a><img src="img/revistas/esrj/v9n1/v9n1a07fig4.gif"></center></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>METHODOLOGY</b></p>     <p>The used methodology is divided in two main steps: the first one   build a shallow elastic model, estimating p-wave velocity from   first arrivals or uphole time in seismic records and measuring swave   velocity from the ground-roll cone in the seismic record.   Besides that the source wavelet is extracted from each shot record.   Finally using the finite difference software the isolated Ground   roll is generated according the procedure mentioned before. In the   second step the generated ground-roll is subtracted numerically   trace by trace from the respective raw shot gather. As result a shot gather with an attenuated ground-roll is obtained.</p>     <p>In order to asses the level of ground-roll attenuation provided by   the method. We compare it with the results obtained with more industry-standard techniques. The same raw shot was filtered using the same Band pass and f-k filters used during the seismic processing of the line. The next section discusses the results.</p>     <p><b>DISCUSIONS AND RESULTS</b></p>     <p>The proposed approach was applied to 30 shot records from a 2D   seismic line of the Colombian foothill are. The data was acquired   with an explosive source at 10 m depth, 15 m group interval,   15 m shot interval, 250 channels and 5 s record length. The raw   shot gather in <a href="#fig5">Figure 5</a> is contaminated by a strong ground-roll   whereas <a href="#fig6">Figure 6</a> displays the same record after ground-roll has been attenuated.</p>     <p>    <center><a name="fig5"></a><img src="img/revistas/esrj/v9n1/v9n1a07fig5.html"></center></p>     <p>    <center><a name="fig6"></a><img src="img/revistas/esrj/v9n1/v9n1a07fig6.html"></center></p>     <p>Although the Ground roll is not completely removed due to the   dispersive nature of the phenomena and the algorithm limitations   to model all relevant aspects of the problem, much of the noise is   indeed removed and the reflections can now be seen through most   of the record. It is important to realize that the attenuation of the   ground-roll has been achieved without distortion of the signal. All   reflections in <a href="#fig6">Figure 6</a> have the same phase and frequency content than corresponding reflections in <a href="#fig5">Figure 5</a>.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>For comparison, <a href="#fig7">Figure 7</a> shows the same shot record filtered   with a trapezoidal filter with frequencies 8-12-70-90 Hz, whereas   <a href="#fig8">Figure 8</a> displays the same shot gather after f-k filter.   Low-cut frequency filtering succeeds at attenuating the lowest   frequency components of the ground-roll, but the low frequency   components of the signal are removed along with it. Therefore, we   do not see a clear improvement in the continuity of the reflections   under the noise cone in <a href="#fig7">Figure 7</a>, as we didi in <a href="#fig6">Figure 6</a>. A similar   conclusion can be drawn by carefully examination of <a href="#fig8">Figure 8</a>.   Although the ground-roll was attenuated, the reflections are not   clearly recovered under the noise cone. Moreover, the f-k filtering   process has added some noise to the record, probably due to irregular, sharp mute required to attenuate the ground-roll.</p>     <p>    <center><a name="fig7"></a><img src="img/revistas/esrj/v9n1/v9n1a07fig7.gif"></center></p>     <p>    <center><a name="fig8"></a><img src="img/revistas/esrj/v9n1/v9n1a07fig8.gif"></center></p>     <p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b></p>     <p>Modeling and subtracting the ground-roll may be more effective   than traditional bandpass filtering or f-k filtering to attenuate the   ground-roll cone in real shot records. Not only is the ground-roll   more attenuated, but just as important, the integrity of the signal,   in terms of phase and frequency content is preserved. The most   critical aspect of the method is the accurate estimation of the   shallow elastic model required to generate the ground-roll. The   accurate extraction of the wavelet is another source of potential inaccuracies.</p>     <p>Attenuating the ground-roll, without distorting the weak reflection   is very important for an accurate and faithful interpretation of data.</p>     <p><b>ACKNOWLEDGMENTS</b></p>     <p>We wish to thank the National Division for Research - DIB of   the National University of Colombia, for providing financial   support. This project is a part of the larger project &ldquo;Modeling   of Seismic dispersion phenomena associated to the Topography   and the near-surface layers of the subsurface&rdquo;, partially funded   by COLCIENCIAS, the National University of Colombia and the Colombian Petroleum Company - ECOPETROL.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>BIBLIOGRAPHY</b></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Aki, K. and Richards, P.G., 1980. Quantitative Seismology, Theory and methods: W.H. Freeman and Company.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000064&pid=S1794-6190200500010000700001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  Blonk, B., 1995. Removal of scattered surface waves from seismic   data: Ph.D. Thesis, Delft Univ.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000065&pid=S1794-6190200500010000700002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  Blonk, B., Herman, G. C., 1994. Inverse scattering of surface   waves: A new look at surface consistency; Geophysics, 59, 963-   972.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000066&pid=S1794-6190200500010000700003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  Dagosto, C., Marfurt, K. and Steven, J., 2002. Modeling and   removal of Ground Roll from horizontal component of C-waves.   SEG.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000067&pid=S1794-6190200500010000700004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  Ernst, F., and Herman, G., 1998. Removal of guided waves from   seismic data in laterally varying media: Wave Motion, 173-189.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000068&pid=S1794-6190200500010000700005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  Ernst, F., Herman, G and Ditzel, A., 2002. Removal of scattered   waves from seismic data, Geophysics, 67, 1240-1248.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000069&pid=S1794-6190200500010000700006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  Ghisays Alfredo., 2005. Fronteras no reflectivas en l&iacute;mites de   modelos S&iacute;smicos. Tesis de Maestr&iacute;a. Universidad Nacional de   Colombia.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000070&pid=S1794-6190200500010000700007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  Larner, K., Chanbers, R., Yank, M., and Wai, W., 1983. Coherent   noise marine seismic data: Geophysics, 48, 869-874.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000071&pid=S1794-6190200500010000700008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  Levander, A. R, 1988. Fourth-order finite diference P-SV   seismograms: Geophysics 53, 1425-1436.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000072&pid=S1794-6190200500010000700009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  Linville, A., and Meek, R., 1995. A procedure for optimally   removing localized coherent noise: Geophysics, 60, 191-203.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000073&pid=S1794-6190200500010000700010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  McMechan, G., and Sun, R., 1991. Depth filtering of breaks and   Ground Roll: Geophysics, 56, 390-396.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000074&pid=S1794-6190200500010000700011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  Sheriff, R, E., and Geldart, L, P., 1991. Exploration Seismology:   History, theory and obtaining of data.V1,2, 51-60.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000075&pid=S1794-6190200500010000700012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font size="2" face="verdana">  Treitel, S., Shanks, J., and Fraiser, C., 1967. Some aspects of fan   filtering: Geophysics, 32, 789 - 800.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000076&pid=S1794-6190200500010000700013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>  Yilmaz, O., 1991. Seismic Data Processing; Investigations geophysics 2. SEG.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000077&pid=S1794-6190200500010000700014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aki]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Richards]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Quantitative Seismology, Theory and methods]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[W.H. Freeman and Company]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blonk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Removal of scattered surface waves from seismic data]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blonk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Herman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Inverse scattering of surface waves: A new look at surface consistency]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geophysics]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<numero>59</numero>
<issue>59</issue>
<page-range>963- 972</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dagosto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marfurt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steven]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Modeling and removal of Ground Roll from horizontal component of C- waves]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[SEG]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ernst]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Herman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Removal of guided waves from seismic data in laterally varying media]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<page-range>173-189</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Wave Motion]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ernst]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Herman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ditzel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Removal of scattered waves from seismic data]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geophysics]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<numero>67</numero>
<issue>67</issue>
<page-range>1240-1248</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ghisays]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alfredo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fronteras no reflectivas en límites de modelos Sísmicos]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Larner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chanbers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yank]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Coherent noise marine seismic data]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geophysics]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<numero>48</numero>
<issue>48</issue>
<page-range>869-874</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Levander]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Fourth-order finite diference P-SV seismograms]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geophysics]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<numero>53</numero>
<issue>53</issue>
<page-range>1425-1436</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Linville]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A procedure for optimally removing localized coherent noise]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geophysics]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<numero>60</numero>
<issue>60</issue>
<page-range>191-203</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McMechan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sun]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Depth filtering of breaks and Ground Roll]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geophysics]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<numero>56</numero>
<issue>56</issue>
<page-range>390-396</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sheriff]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R, E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geldart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L, P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Exploration Seismology]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[History, theory and obtaining of data]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>51-60</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Treitel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shanks]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fraiser]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Some aspects of fan filtering]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geophysics]]></source>
<year>1967</year>
<numero>32</numero>
<issue>32</issue>
<page-range>789 - 800</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yilmaz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Seismic Data Processing: Investigations geophysics 2]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[SEG]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
