<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1900-6586</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Científica General José María Córdova]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. Cient. Gen. José María Córdova]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1900-6586</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Escuela Militar de Cadetes "General José María Córdova"]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1900-65862018000200061</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21830/19006586.321</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The evolution of intelligent design: between religion and science]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[La evolución del diseño inteligente: entre religión y ciencia]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[A evoluçâo do design inteligente: entre religiáo e ciencia]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[L&#8217;évolution du design intelligent: entre religion et science]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sandino Vargas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Enrique]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caccamo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marta]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hashim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Sumaya]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eng]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Oskar]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Antonio Nariño  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,önköping International Business School  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Jönköping ]]></addr-line>
<country>Sweden</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Sweden ]]></addr-line>
<country>Suecia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af4">
<institution><![CDATA[,Jönköping International Business School  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Jönköping ]]></addr-line>
<country>Sweden</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>22</numero>
<fpage>61</fpage>
<lpage>80</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1900-65862018000200061&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1900-65862018000200061&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1900-65862018000200061&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract This work evaluates intelligent design (ID) as a pseudoscience. Science has many attached formal definitions, as does pseudoscience. They have both been contested in various fields. In the political sphere, they are both characterized by a plurality of conflicting views. There is no single philosophy of science, thus, no unique methodology. Demarcation is not a clear-cut. This issue becomes problematic in evaluating Intelligent Design as its proponents claim that scientists have dismissed ID on the grounds of it lacking scientificity. Here, we select a set of pseudoscience definitions to evaluate whether ID meets the demarcation criteria. Given that our unit of analysis is Intelligent Design, the question we set out to answer is whether intelligent design is a pseudoscience or can intelligent design be characterized as one or more forms of pseudoscience.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen Este trabajo evalúa el diseño inteligente (DI) como una pseudociencia. La ciencia ha incorporado muchas definiciones; asimismo la pseudociencia. Ambas han sido discutidas en diversos ámbitos. En la esfera política, están caracterizadas por una pluralidad de conflictos de visiones en discusión. No existe una sola filosofía de la ciencia, consecuencia, tampoco una sola metodología. Los criterios de demarcación no son claros. Esto se torna problemático al evaluar el diseño inteligente. Los científicos no conciben incluir el diseño en el campo científico en su pretensión de que carece de cientificidad. Aquí, seleccionamos un conjunto de definiciones de pseudociencia para evaluar si el DI satisface los criterios de demarcación. Dado que nuestra unidad de análisis es el DI, se plantea la pregunta si el diseño inteligente es una pseudociencia, o si se puede caracterizar el diseño inteligente como una o varias formas de pseudociencia.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Este trabalho avalia o design inteligente (DI) como uma pseudociencia. A ciencia incor- porou muitas definiçoes; também a pseudociencia. Ambas foram discutidas em vários campos. Na esfera política, ambas sáo caracterizadas por uma pluralidade de visoes conflituantes. Náo existe uma única filosofia da ciencia, portanto, nenhuma metodologia única. Os critérios para demarcaçâo náo sáo claros. Isso se torna problemático na avaliaçâo do design inteligente, uma vez que seus proponentes afirmam que os cientistas náo pretendem incluir o design no campo científico em sua alegaçâo de que falta cientificidade. Aqui, selecionamos um conjunto de definiçoes de pseudociencia para determinar se o DI atende aos critérios de demarcaçâo. Dado que nossa unidade de análise é o DI, a questáo que nos propomos a responder é se o design inteligente é uma pseudociencia ou se o design inteligente é caracterizado como uma ou várias formas de pseudociencia.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[Résumé Ce travail évalue le dessein intelligent (DI) en tant que pseudoscience. La science a incorporé plusieurs définitions; aussi la pseudoscience. Les deux ont été discutés dans divers domaines. Dans le domaine politique, ils sont caractérisés par une pluralité de points de vue contradictoires. Il n&#8217;y a pas de philosophie unique de la science, donc pas de méthodologie unique. Les critères de démarcation ne sont pas clairs. Cela devient problématique lors de l&#8217;évaluation de la conception intelligente. Les scientifiques n&#8217;ont pas l&#8217;intention d&#8217;inclure le design dans le domaine scientifique dans leur affirmation selon laquelle il manque de scientificité. Ici, nous sélectionnons un ensemble de définitions de pseudosciences pour évaluer si la DI répond aux critères de démarcation. Puisque notre unité d&#8217;analyse est la DI, la question se pose de savoir si le design intelligent est une pseudoscience, ou si le design intelligent peut etre caractérisé comme une ou plusieurs formes de pseudoscience.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[demarcation criteria]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[naturalism]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[pseudoscience]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[scientific method]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[criterios de demarcación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[diseño inteligente]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[método científico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[naturalismo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[pseu- dociencia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[critérios de demarcaçáo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[design inteligente]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[método científico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[naturalismo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[pseu- dociencia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[critères de démarcation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[dessein intelligent]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[méthode scientifique]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[naturalisme]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[pseudoscience]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aquinas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<collab>Fathers of the English Dominican Province</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Summa Theologica]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[MobileReference]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baigrie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Siegel on the Rationality of Science]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Philosophy of Science]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<page-range>435-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beckwith]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F. J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Science and religion twenty years after McLean v. Arkansas: Evolution, public education, and the new challenge of intelligent design]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Harv. JL &amp; Pub. Pol&#8217;y]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<page-range>455</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Behe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Darwin&#8217;s black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Simon and Schuster]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bunge]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[What is pseudoscience]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Skeptical Inquirer]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>36-47</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kenyon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thaxton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Of pandas and people: The central question of biological origins: Foundation for Thought &amp; Ethics]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dawkins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The blind watchmaker: why the evidence of evolution reveals a world without design]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[WW Norton]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dembski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Science and Design]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[First Things]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<page-range>21-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dembski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science &amp; Theology]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dembski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[In defense of intelligent design]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dembski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McDowell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Understanding intelligent design]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harvest House Publishers]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Discovery Institute - Center for Science and Culture</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Definition of Intelligent Design]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Swedenborg and the plurality of worlds: Astrotheology in the eighteenth century]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Zygon]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>450-79</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gardner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Martin]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science]]></source>
<year>1957</year>
<edition>2nd</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Mineola, New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Dover Publications]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[George]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[What would Thomas Aquinas say about Intelligent Design?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[New Blackfriars]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>94</volume>
<numero>1054</numero>
<issue>1054</issue>
<page-range>676-700</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Steve]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The demarcation of science: a problem whose demise has been greatly exaggerated]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Pacific Philosophical Quarterly]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>66</volume>
<page-range>329-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hansson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S., O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cutting the Gordian Knot of demarcation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Studies in the Philosophy of Science]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>237-43</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hume]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>IOSE</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Significance of Origins Science ideas and issues]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Koperski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Two bad ways to attack intelligent design and two good ones]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Zygon]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>433-49</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mc Pherson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[What is the argument from design?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Argument from Design]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<page-range>1-13</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Natural Theology: Or, Evidences of the Existence and Atttributes of the Deity: Collected from the Appearances of Nature]]></source>
<year>1833</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peterson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Intelligent-Design Movement: Science or Ideology?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Zygon]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>7-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pullen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Intelligent Design Or Evolution? : Why the Origin of Life and the Evolution of Molecular Knowledge Imply Design: Intelligent Design Books]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sedley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Oxford studies in ancient philosophy]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>33</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wallis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The evolution wars]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Time]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>166</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
<page-range>26-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wexler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Of Pandas, People, and the First Amendment: The Constitutionality of Teaching Intelligent Design in the Public Schools]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Stanford Law Review]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<page-range>439-70</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Woodruff]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Socrates among the Sophists]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[A Companion to Socrates]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<page-range>36</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
