<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0121-182X</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Prolegómenos]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Prolegómenos]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0121-182X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Militar Nueva Granada]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0121-182X2020000100033</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18359/prole.3546</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[La jurisprudencia sobre &#8220;casos límite&#8221; en materia de pensión de invalidez: derrotabilidad normativa desde la Constitución]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Case Law on &#8220;Borderline Cases&#8221; of Disability Pension: Defeasibility from the Constitution]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[A jurisprudência sobre &#8220;casos-limite&#8221; em matéria de aposentadoria por invalidez: derrotabilidade das normas a partir da Constituição]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuentes Orozco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jesús José]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Colombia  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>45</numero>
<fpage>33</fpage>
<lpage>49</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0121-182X2020000100033&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0121-182X2020000100033&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0121-182X2020000100033&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN Con el objetivo cardinal de analizar las implicaciones de la irrupción del neoconstitucionalismo en el sistema jurídico colombiano, en el presente escrito se analiza si la jurisprudencia constitucional sobre los &#8220;casos límite&#8221; en materia de pensión de invalidez goza de razón suficiente para justificar la no aplicación de los requisitos fijados por el legislador como condición para acceder al derecho prestacional indicado. Aplicando una metodología analítica, se abordaron elementos conceptuales que permiten estudiar, explicar y valorar la tensión subyacente entre la protección de los derechos fundamentales en situaciones concretas, y la legitimidad y eficacia de los mandatos legales. Considerando el papel de los jueces y la supremacía de la Constitución, se verá que la derrotabilidad de las leyes en situaciones concretas obedece a que la esencia misma de la Ley Mayor lleva al poder judicial a adoptar medidas concretas para superar los efectos inconstitucionales de la ley en casos específicos.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT To analyze the implications of the emergence of neo-constitutionalism in the Colombian legal system, this paper discusses whether constitutional case law on &#8220;borderline cases&#8221; of disability pension is a good cause for the nonapplication of the requirements set out by the legislator to access the relevant benefits right. Using an analytical method, the research addresses conceptual elements to study, explain, and assess the underlying tension between the protection of fundamental rights in specific situations and the legitimacy and effectiveness of legal orders. Considering the role of judges and the supremacy of the Constitution, it is concluded that defeasibility in specific cases is because the very essence of the Constitution causes the judiciary to adopt concrete measures to overcome the unconstitutional effects of the law.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[RESUMO Como objetivo principal de analisar as implicações da irrupção do neoconstitucionalismo no sistema jurídico colombiano, neste texto, é analisado se a jurisprudência constitucional sobre os &#8220;casos-limite&#8221; em matéria de aposentadoria por invalidez é suficiente racional para justificar a não aplicação dos requisitos estabelecidos pelo legislador como condição para acessar o direito prestacional indicado. Aplicando uma metodologia analítica, foram abordados elementos conceituais que permitem estudar, explicar e avaliar a tensão subjacente entre a proteção dos direitos fundamentais em situações concretas e a legitimidade e eficácia dos mandatos legais. Considerando o papel dos juízes e da supremacia da Constituição, é visto que a derrotabilidade das normas em situações concretas obedece a que a essência em si da Lei Maior leva o poder judicial a adotar medidas concretas para superar os efeitos inconstitucionais da lei em casos específicos.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[pensión de invalidez]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[supremacía constitucional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[derechos fundamentales]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[derrotabilidad de la ley]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[neoconstitucionalismo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Disability pension]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[constitutional supremacy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[fundamental rights]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[defeasibility]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[neoconstitutionalism]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[aposentadora por invalidez]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[supremacia constitucional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[direitos fundamentais]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[derrotabilidade da lei]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[neoconstitucionalismo]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alexy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La doble naturaleza del Derecho]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Trotta]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arenas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El derecho colombiano de la seguridad social]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Temis]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arrieta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La constitucionalización del Derecho y su incidencia en Colombia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Pensamiento Americano]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<page-range>65-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bernal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El neoconstitucionalismo a debate]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Externado de Colombia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bernal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El neoconstitucionalismo y la normatividad del Derecho]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá D. C. ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Externado de Colombia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bidart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Nociones constitucionales. Las intersecciones iusnaturalistas de la Constitución]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ediar]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bidart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Compendio de Derecho Constitucional]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castaño Peña]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Análisis económico del activismo judicial: el caso de la Corte Constitucional colombiana]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Derecho del Estado]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<numero>31</numero>
<issue>31</issue>
<page-range>119-60</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cepeda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Polémicas constitucionales]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Legis]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Uprimny Yepes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rodrigo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<collab>Corte Constitucional de Colombia</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Sentencia C-760]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Córdoba Triviño]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jaime]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<collab>Corte Constitucional de Colombia</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Sentencia T-043]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[María Victoria]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<collab>Corte Constitucional de Colombia</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Sentencia C-429]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tafur Galvis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Álvaro]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<collab>Corte Constitucional de Colombia</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Sentencia C-247]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vargas Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luis Ernesto]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<collab>Corte Constitucional de Colombia</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Sentencia C-914]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ríos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alberto Rojas]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<collab>Corte Constitucional de Colombia</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Sentencia T-503]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rojas Ríos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alberto]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<collab>Corte Constitucional de Colombia</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Sentencia T-053]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferreyra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fundamentos constitucionales]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ediar]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García Amado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[¿Existe la discrecionalidad en la decisión judicial?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Isegoría]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<numero>35</numero>
<issue>35</issue>
<page-range>151-72</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García de Enterría]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La lengua de los Derechos. La formación del Derecho Público europeo tras la Revolución Francesa]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García Yzaguirre]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La validez prima facie y el principio de derrotabilidad de las normas jurídicas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Dikaion]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<numero>21</numero>
<issue>21</issue>
<page-range>459-87</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kelsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[¿Quién debe ser el defensor de la Constitución?]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Tecnos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kelsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Teoría pura del Derecho]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Porrúa]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[León]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El concepto de derrotabilidad]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. L. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Un punto de vista lógico]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Teoría impura del Derecho]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Legis]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El derecho de los jueces]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Legis]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ponderación versus subsunción jurídica: ¿la crisis de la certeza del Derecho?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Derecho]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<numero>23</numero>
<issue>23</issue>
<page-range>53-67</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maraniello]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El activismo judicial, una herramienta de protección constitucional]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de Buenos Aires]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La constitucionalización de la justicia y la autonomía judicial]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional de Colombia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rousseau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El contrato social]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Taurus]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Suárez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La constitucionalización del Derecho en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Vniversitas]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<numero>129</numero>
<issue>129</issue>
<page-range>317-51</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valadés]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Problemas constitucionales del Estado de Derecho]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Astrea]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vita]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La legitimidad del Derecho y del Estado en el pensamiento jurídico de Weimar: Hans Kelsen, Carl Schmitt y Hermann Heller]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Eudeba]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zaffaroni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Doctrina penal nazi]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<numero>14</numero>
<issue>14</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
