<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0120-2596</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Lecturas de Economía]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Lect. Econ.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0120-2596</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de Antioquia]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0120-25962023000200153</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17533/udea.le.n99a349646</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[El progreso tecnológico desde un punto de vista poskeynesiano: una comparación entre Estados Unidos y China]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Technological progress from a Post Keynesian point of view: a comparison between the United States and China]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[Le progrès technologique d&#8217;un point de vue post-keynésien: une comparaison entre les États-Unis et la Chine]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bernal-Bellón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José Reyes]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Antonio Nariño  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>99</numero>
<fpage>153</fpage>
<lpage>173</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0120-25962023000200153&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0120-25962023000200153&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0120-25962023000200153&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen: Este artículo plantea un contraste entre la productividad total de los factores (PTF) para China y Estados Unidos. Se comparan los cálculos de la PTF entre el residuo de Solow tradicional y la propuesta poskeynesiana desarrollada a partir de la diferencia entre la tasa de crecimiento observada y la ecuación de Harrod. El cálculo de la productividad y su contribución al crecimiento económico para China entre 1952 y 2014 es de -8,7 % según la base de datos de la Penn Word table 9.0, dato poco realista&#894; mientras que desde el punto de vista poskeynesiano, su contribución al crecimiento es del orden del 5,4 % dándole gran importancia al a participación del capital y el trabajo. El mismo ejercicio se realiza para Estados Unidos y se encuentran datos más razonables de su contribución al crecimiento a partir de la propuesta poskeynesiana.  Clasificación JEL:  O40, O47, O57.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract: This article presents a comparison of total factor productivity (TFP) for China and the United States. The TFP calculations are compared between the traditional Solow residual and the post-Keynesian proposal developed from the difference between the observed growth rate and the Harrod equation. The calculation of productivity and its contribution to economic growth for China between 1952 and 2014 is -8.7 % unrealistic data, while from the post-Keynesian point of view its contribution to growth is of the order of 5.4 % giving it significant importance to the participation of capital and labor. The same exercise is done for the United States and more reasonable data are found on its contribution to growth based on the post-Keynesian proposal.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[Résumé: Cet article présente un contraste entre la productivité totale des facteurs (PTF) de la Chine et celle des États-Unis. Les calculs de la PTF sont comparés entre le résidu de Solow traditionnel et la proposition post-keynésienne développée à partir de la différence entre le taux de croissance observé et l&#8217;équation de Harrod. Le calcul de la productivité et de sa contribution à la croissance économique pour la Chine entre 1952 et 2014 est de -8,7 % selon la base de données Penn Word table 9.0, un chiffre irréaliste &#894; tandis que du point de vue post-keynésien, sa contribution à la croissance est de l&#8217;ordre de 5,4 %, donnant une grande importance à la participation du capital et du travail. Le même exercice est effectué pour les États-Unis et des données plus raisonnables sur leur contribution à la croissance sont trouvées dans la proposition post-keynésienne.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[productividad total de los factores]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[crecimiento económico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[ecuación de Harrod]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Total factor productivity]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[economic growth]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Harrod equation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[productivité totale des facteurs]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[croissance économique]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[équation de Harrod]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bernal-Bellón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La tasa de crecimiento garantizada de Harrod como ley del crecimiento: Una comprobación empírica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuadernos de Economía]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>49</numero>
<issue>49</issue>
<page-range>57-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bernal-Bellón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El residuo de Solow revisado]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Economía Institucional]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>12</numero>
<issue>12</issue>
<page-range>347-61</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Easterly]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Ghost of Financing Gap: How the Harrod_Domar Growth Model Still Haunts Development Economics]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Policy Research Working Paper]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Easterly]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The ghost of financing Gap: Testing the growth models used in the Internal Financial Institutions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Development Economics]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>60</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>423-38</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[New Growth Theory: Effective Demand, and Post Keynesian Dynamics]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Department of Economic. University of Notre Dame]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grabowski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shields]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Keynesian Model of Development]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Economic Development]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-15</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Feenstra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Inklaar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Timmer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Next Generation of the Penn World Table]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Economic Review]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>105</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>3150-82</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harrod]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La Teoría Dinámica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Economía del Crecimiento]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<page-range>43-62</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Fondo de Cultura Económica]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Griliches]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Explanation of Productivity Change]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Review of Economic Studies]]></source>
<year>1967</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>249-83</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McCombie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. S. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Regional Production and the Accounting Identity: A Problem of Interpretation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Australasian Journal of Regional Studies]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<month>a</month>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McCombie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. S. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Solow Residual, Technical Change and Aggregate Production Functions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Post Keynesian Economics]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<month>b</month>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>267-97</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Palley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Post Keynesian Macroeconomics: Debt, Distribution and the Macroeconomic]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Macmillan]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Palley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Growth Theory in a Keynesian Mode: Some Keynesian foundations for the theory of economic growth]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Post Keynesian Economics]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>113-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Prescott]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Needed: A theory of total factor productivity]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Economic Review]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>529-49</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Solow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Progreso técnico y cambio de la productividad]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Economía del Crecimiento]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<page-range>385-401</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Fondo de Cultura Económica]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Solow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Review of Economics and Statistics]]></source>
<year>1957</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>312-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
