<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0122-5383</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología y Futuro]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[C.T.F Cienc. Tecnol. Futuro]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0122-5383</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto Colombiano del Petróleo (ICP) - ECOPETROL S.A.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0122-53832012000100001</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[PRE-STACK SEISMIC INVERSION BASED ON A GENETIC ALGORITHM: A CASE FROM THE LLANOS BASIN (COLOMBIA) IN THE ABSENCE OF WELL INFORMATION]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moncayo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Edward]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tchegliakova]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nadejda]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Montes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luis]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Petrobras Colombia  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Bogotá Cundinamarca]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Colombia Geoscience Dept ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Bogotá Cundinamarca]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<fpage>5</fpage>
<lpage>20</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0122-53832012000100001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0122-53832012000100001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0122-53832012000100001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The Llanos basin is the most prolific of the Colombian basins; however few stratigraphic plays have been explored due to the uncertainty in determining the lithology of the channels. Inside a migrated 2D section, a wide channel was identified inside a prospective sandy unit of the Carbonera Formation, composed by intercalations of sand and shale levels, and considered a main reservoir in this part of the basin. However, the lithology filling the channel was unknown due to the absence of wells. To infer the channel lithology, and diminish the prospective risk a model based pre-stack seismic inversion was proposed. However, without well logs available along the line, the uncertain initial model diminishes reliance on the inversion. To circumvent this impasse, a seismic inversion with a genetic algorithm was proposed. The algorithm was tested on synthetic seismograms and real data from an area of the basin, where well logs were available. The error analysis between the expected and the inverted results, in both scenarios, pointed out a good algorithmic performance. Then, the algorithm was applied to the pre stack data of the 2D line where the channel had been identified. According to the inverted results and rock physics analysis of wells near the seismic line with comparative geology, classified the channel was described as to be filled by silt, shale and probably some levels of shaly sands, increasing the exploratory risk because this lithology has low porosity and permeability, contrary to the producing reservoirs in neighbor fields, characterized by clean sands of high porosity. The algorithm is useful in areas with few or no borehole logs.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[La cuenca Llanos es la más prolífica de Colombia, sin embargo pocos "plays" estratigráficos han sido explorados debido a la incertidumbre en determinar la litología en esos canales. En una sección 2D migrada se identificó un canal ancho en una unidad arenosa prospectiva de la Formación Carbonera que está compuesta de intercalaciones de arenas y lutitas, y es considerada un importante reservorio en esta parte de la cuenca. Sin embargo la litología del canal era desconocida debido a la ausencia de pozos. Para inferir la litología del canal y aminorar el riesgo exploratorio se propuso una inversión pre apilada basada en modelo. Sin embargo, sin registros de pozo sobre la línea, el incierto modelo inicial disminuía la confiabilidad en el resultado de la inversión. La solución alterna fue usar un algoritmo genético para la inversión de datos sísmicos pre-apilados. El algoritmo se probó con sismogramas sintéticos y datos sísmicos de otra zona de la cuenca que tenía registros de pozo. El análisis de error entre los valores esperados y observados de la inversión, en ambos escenarios, indicó un buen desempeño. Luego se aplicó en la inversión de los datos sísmicos de la zona 2D donde se identificó el canal. De acuerdo con los resultados de la inversión y el análisis de física de rocas en pozos cercanos que poseen una geología comparable, se discriminó la litología del canal como limolitas y lutitas, con probables niveles de arenas con alto contenido de arcilla. Este resultado señala un incremento del riesgo exploratorio ya que estas litologías se caracterizan por su baja porosidad y baja permeabilidad, lo que contrasta con los reservorios productores en los campos cercanos que están compuestos por arenas limpias de alta porosidad. El algoritmo es útil en zonas con escasa o nula información de pozo.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Abacia Llanos é a mais prolífica da Colômbia, entretanto poucos "plays" estratigráficos têm sido explorados devido à incerteza em determinar a litologia nesses canais. Em uma seção 2D migrada identificou-se um canal largo em uma unidade arenosa prospectiva da Formação Carbonífera que está composta de intercalações de areias e xistos, e é considerada um importante reservatório nesta parte da bacia. Porém a litologia do canal era desconhecida devido à ausência de poços. Para inferir a litologia do canal e diminuir o risco exploratório se propôs uma inversão pré-empilhada baseado em modelo. Entretanto, sem registros de poço sobre a linha, o incerto modelo inicial diminuía a confiabilidade no resultado do investimento. A solução alterna foi usar um algoritmo genético para a inversão de dados sísmicos pré-empilhados. O algoritmo provou-se com sismogramas sintéticos e dados sísmicos de outra zona da bacia que tinha registros de poço. A análise de erro entre os valores esperados e observados da inversão, em ambos cenários, indicou um bom desempenho. Logo se aplicou na inversão dos dados sísmicos da zona 2D onde se identificou o canal. De acordo com os resultados da inversão e a análise de física de rochas em poços próximos que possuem uma geologia comparável, discriminou-se a litologia do canal como siltitos e xistos, com prováveis níveis de areias com alto conteúdo de argila. Este resultado sinala um incremento do risco exploratório já que estas litologias se caracterizam pela sua baixa porosidade e baixa permeabilidade, o que contrasta com os reservatórios produtores nos campos próximos que estão compostos por areias limpas de alta porosidade.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Seismic inversion]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Channel lithology]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Genetic algorithm]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Llanos basin]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Inversión sísmica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Litología de canales]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Algoritmo genético]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Cuenca Llanos Orientales]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Inversão sísmica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Litologia de canais]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Algoritmo genético]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Bacia Llanos Orientais]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[   <font face="Verdana" size="2">      <p><font size="4">    <center><b><b>PRE-STACK SEISMIC INVERSION BASED ON A GENETIC ALGORITHM: A CASE FROM THE LLANOS BASIN (COLOMBIA) IN THE ABSENCE OF WELL INFORMATION</b></b></center></font></p>      <p>    <center><b>Edward Moncayo</b><sup>1</sup>, <b>Nadejda Tchegliakova</b><sup>2</sup> <b>and Luis Montes</b><sup>2*</sup></center></p>     <p>    <center><sup>1</sup>Exploration, Petrobras Colombia, Bogot&aacute;, Cundinamarca, Colombia    <br>  <sup>2</sup>Geoscience Dept., Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogot&aacute;, Cundinamarca, Colombia</center></p>     <p>    <center>e-mail: <a href="mailto:emoncayo@petrobras.com">emoncayo@petrobras.com</a> <a href="mailto:ntchegliakovan@unaI.edu.co">ntchegliakovan@unaI.edu.co</a> <a href="mailto:lmontesv@unal.edu.co">lmontesv@unal.edu.co</a></center></p>       ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>    <center><i>(Received Jul. 19, 2011; Accepted May 15, 2012)</i></center></p>     <p>    <center><sup>*</sup><i>To whom correspondence should be addressed</i></center></p> <hr>      <p><font size=3><b>ABSTRACT</b></font></p>      <p>The Llanos basin is the most prolific of the Colombian basins; however few stratigraphic plays have been explored due to the uncertainty in determining the lithology of the channels. Inside a migrated 2D section, a wide channel was identified inside a prospective sandy unit of the Carbonera Formation, composed by intercalations of sand and shale levels, and considered a main reservoir in this part of the basin. However, the lithology filling the channel was unknown due to the absence of wells. To infer the channel lithology, and diminish the prospective risk a model based pre-stack seismic inversion was proposed. However, without well logs available along the line, the uncertain initial model diminishes reliance on the inversion. To circumvent this impasse, a seismic inversion with a genetic algorithm was proposed. The algorithm was tested on synthetic seismograms and real data from an area of the basin, where well logs were available. The error analysis between the expected and the inverted results, in both scenarios, pointed out a good algorithmic performance. Then, the algorithm was applied to the pre stack data of the 2D line where the channel had been identified.</p>      <p>According to the inverted results and rock physics analysis of wells near the seismic line with comparative geology, classified the channel was described as to be filled by silt, shale and probably some levels of shaly sands, increasing the exploratory risk because this lithology has low porosity and permeability, contrary to the producing reservoirs in neighbor fields, characterized by clean sands of high porosity.</p>     <p>The algorithm is useful in areas with few or no borehole logs.</p>   <b><i>Keywords: </i></b><i>Seismic inversion, Channel lithology, Genetic algorithm, Llanos basin.</i></p>   <hr>      <p><font size=3><b>RESUMEN</b></font></p>      <p>La cuenca Llanos es la m&aacute;s prol&iacute;fica de Colombia, sin embargo pocos "<i>plays</i>" estratigr&aacute;ficos han sido explorados debido a la incertidumbre en determinar la litolog&iacute;a en esos canales. En una secci&oacute;n 2D migrada se identific&oacute; un canal ancho en una unidad arenosa prospectiva de la Formaci&oacute;n Carbonera que est&aacute; compuesta de intercalaciones de arenas y lutitas, y es considerada un importante reservorio en esta parte de la cuenca. Sin embargo la litolog&iacute;a del canal era desconocida debido a la ausencia de pozos.</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Para inferir la litolog&iacute;a del canal y aminorar el riesgo exploratorio se propuso una inversi&oacute;n pre apilada basada en modelo. Sin embargo, sin registros de pozo sobre la l&iacute;nea, el incierto modelo inicial disminu&iacute;a la confiabilidad en el resultado de la inversi&oacute;n. La soluci&oacute;n alterna fue usar un algoritmo gen&eacute;tico para la inversi&oacute;n de datos s&iacute;smicos pre-apilados.</p>      <p>El algoritmo se prob&oacute; con sismogramas sint&eacute;ticos y datos s&iacute;smicos de otra zona de la cuenca que ten&iacute;a registros de pozo. El an&aacute;lisis de error entre los valores esperados y observados de la inversi&oacute;n, en ambos escenarios, indic&oacute; un buen desempe&ntilde;o. Luego se aplic&oacute; en la inversi&oacute;n de los datos s&iacute;smicos de la zona 2D donde se identific&oacute; el canal. De acuerdo con los resultados de la inversi&oacute;n y el an&aacute;lisis de f&iacute;sica de rocas en pozos cercanos que poseen una geolog&iacute;a comparable, se discrimin&oacute; la litolog&iacute;a del canal como limolitas y lutitas, con probables niveles de arenas con alto contenido de arcilla. Este resultado se&ntilde;ala un incremento del riesgo exploratorio ya que estas litolog&iacute;as se caracterizan por su baja porosidad y baja permeabilidad, lo que contrasta con los reservorios productores en los campos cercanos que est&aacute;n compuestos por arenas limpias de alta porosidad.</p>      <p>El algoritmo es &uacute;til en zonas con escasa o nula informaci&oacute;n de pozo.</p>      <p><b><i>Palabras clave: </i></b><i>Inversi&oacute;n s&iacute;smica, Litolog&iacute;a de canales, Algoritmo gen&eacute;tico, Cuenca Llanos Orientales.</i></p>  <hr>      <p><font size=3><b>RESUMO</b></font></p>      <p>Abacia Llanos &eacute; a mais prol&iacute;fica da Col&ocirc;mbia, entretanto poucos "plays" estratigr&aacute;ficos t&ecirc;m sido explorados devido &agrave; incerteza em determinar a litologia nesses canais. Em uma se&ccedil;&atilde;o 2D migrada identificou-se um canal largo em uma unidade arenosa prospectiva da Forma&ccedil;&atilde;o Carbon&iacute;fera que est&aacute; composta de intercala&ccedil;&otilde;es de areias e xistos, e &eacute; considerada um importante reservat&oacute;rio nesta parte da bacia. Por&eacute;m a litologia do canal era desconhecida devido &agrave; aus&ecirc;ncia de po&ccedil;os.</p>      <p>Para inferir a litologia do canal e diminuir o risco explorat&oacute;rio se prop&ocirc;s uma invers&atilde;o pr&eacute;-empilhada baseado em modelo. Entretanto, sem registros de po&ccedil;o sobre a linha, o incerto modelo inicial diminu&iacute;a a confiabilidade no resultado do investimento. A solu&ccedil;&atilde;o alterna foi usar um algoritmo gen&eacute;tico para a invers&atilde;o de dados s&iacute;smicos pr&eacute;-empilhados.</p>      <p>O algoritmo provou-se com sismogramas sint&eacute;ticos e dados s&iacute;smicos de outra zona da bacia que tinha registros de po&ccedil;o. A an&aacute;lise de erro entre os valores esperados e observados da invers&atilde;o, em ambos cen&aacute;rios, indicou um bom desempenho. Logo se aplicou na invers&atilde;o dos dados s&iacute;smicos da zona 2D onde se identificou o canal. De acordo com os resultados da invers&atilde;o e a an&aacute;lise de f&iacute;sica de rochas em po&ccedil;os pr&oacute;ximos que possuem uma geologia compar&aacute;vel, discriminou-se a litologia do canal como siltitos e xistos, com prov&aacute;veis n&iacute;veis de areias com alto conte&uacute;do de argila. Este resultado sinala um incremento do risco explorat&oacute;rio j&aacute; que estas litologias se caracterizam pela sua baixa porosidade e baixa permeabilidade, o que contrasta com os reservat&oacute;rios produtores nos campos pr&oacute;ximos que est&atilde;o compostos por areias limpas de alta porosidade.</p>      <p>O algoritmo &eacute; &uacute;til em zonas com escassa ou nula informa&ccedil;&atilde;o de po&ccedil;o.</p>      <p><b><i>Palavras chave: </i></b><i>Invers&atilde;o s&iacute;smica, Litologia de canais, Algoritmo gen&eacute;tico, Bacia Llanos Orientais.</i></p>  <hr>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font size=3><b>1. INTRODUCTION</b></font></p>      <p>The exploration of traps with stratigraphic components requires the differentiation of clay levels and definition of sand bodies, in order to identify potential reservoirs and caprock. The seismic data possesses information regarding the lithology and fluid content of the rocks through which the waves propagate, described by Zoeppritz's equations, and reported in the works of Koefoed (1955) and Gassmann (1951). This information, contained in the amplitude variation with the offset, can be recovered through the inversion of pre and post stack data (Anderson, 2009). In the Putumayo basin, an inversion by means of multiple attributes estimated the properties of a reservoir, allowing the identification of formation areas and the discrimination of a channel in a transitional environment under the influence of tides (Guerrero, Vargas &amp; Montes, 2010). Stratigraphic traps can be identified by increasing the resolution through the use of spectral inversion (Puryear &amp; Castagna, 2008), which, along with the inversion, would allow the lithological differentiation of these traps, and thus reduce the risk of their exploration. The use of spectral inversion with a genetic algorithm in the Putumayo basin allowed the identification of thin distributary canals in a depositional cycle of the Barco Formation (Casta&ntilde;o, Ojeda &amp; Montes, 2011).</p>      <p>It has been reported that noise generates little effect on pre-stack data inversion and provides reliable results, but it is sensitive to NMO residues and imprecisions in the wavelet estimation. Therefore, an adequate data processing and a careful sampling of the wavelet is suggested (Labat <i>et al</i>., 2005). In addition, the reliable product of a model-based inversion requires an initial model close to the geological model, which can only be guaranteed in the vicinity of the well. This is a nonlinear optimization problem with an irregular objective function.</p>      <p>Optimization methods such as matrix inversion, gradient descent, or conjugate gradient, are likely to get caught up in local minimums, with their success relying largely on the choice of the initial model (Sen, 2006). The genetic algorithms are suitable search methods for global optimization of irregular multimodal functions. They are capable of solving nonlocal, nonlinear optimization problems without the need of calculating derivatives. Moreover, since genetic algorithms are based only on the direct sampling of the area, they avoid any attempt to render the problem linear, thereby removing errors resulting from estimates. The above factors make genetic algorithms particularly attractive to address complex real world problems, including geophysical problems (Mallick, 1999; Rua, Jian-hua, Shuai-qi &amp; Yang, 2009). A comprehensive treatise on genetic algorithms is beyond the scope of this article; hence the consult of specialized books is highly recommended (Mitchell, 1998).</p>      <p>In order to discriminate the lithology of a canal seen in a 2D seismic section on which no well information was available, a genetic algorithm was designed to perform a seismic inversion on the data before stacking, as this does not require any a priori information. The algorithm was tested with synthetic seismograms and real data in another area where there were well logs, and in both scenarios the algorithm showed to be robust when conducting the inversion.</p>      <p>The results of the inversion and the rock physics analysis of some wells in the area, allowed for the discrimination of channel lithology such as siltstones and shale, and probably including some levels of sand with high clay content- a lithology which increases the exploratory risk because of its low porosity and low permeability.</p>      <p><font size=3><b>2. GEOLOGICAL SETTING</b></font></p>      <p>The study area is located in the municipality of Paz de Ariporo, department of Casanare (<a href="#fig1">Figure 1</a>). It corresponds geologically to the central part of the Llanos Basin, which contains several oil fields where production comes from Oligocene units.</p>      <p>    <center><a name="fig1"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01f1.jpg"></a></center></p>       ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The basin contains Paleozoic, Cretaceous, and Tertiary rocks that overlie a Precambrian crystalline basement. The Cretaceous comprises the Une Gacheta and Guadalupe Formations. The Tertiary includes the Barco, Cuervos, Mirador, Carbonera, Le&oacute;n and Guayabo Formations; however, the first three units are not found inside the study area.</p>      <p>The unit of interest in the study area is the Carbonera Formation, consisting of intercalations of sand (C1, C3, C5 and C7) and clay (C2, C4, C6 and C8) levels, which act as reservoirs and seals, respectively. Those showing the highest prospectivity are C7, C5 and C3; however, the last two exhibit severe facial changes which increase the exploratory risk. Regionally, the Carbonera Formation lays above the Mirador Formation and below, is the Le&oacute;n Formation. In the study area, the Carbonera Formation lies directly on the Guadalupe Formation. The depositional environment of the C8 is of a coastal plain with 30 m average thickness in the study area, while C7 is of fluvial origin, whose sands are channel depositions, and the clay and silt surfaces flooding depositions, with a 90 m thickness. The C6 is a coastal plain of depositional environment with 25 m average thickness. The C5 is of fluvial origin, being the sands channel deposits, and the clay and silt flooding surface depositions, with a 90 m thickness. The C4 has a coastal plain depositional environment and it is approximately 15 m thick in the study area.</p>      <p>The C3's sediments are of fluvial origin, as in the C1, but the sand channels are thinner and difficult to correlate between wells. This unit has a thickness of approximately 60 m. The depositional environment of the C2 is of a coastal plain with a thickness of 30 m. Unit C1 is of fluvial origin, where the sands are channel deposits and the clay and silt are flooding surface deposits. Occasionally, thin layers of coal can be found, especially towards the base of the sequence. It has a thickness of 100 m. These sequences thicken gradually towards the western part of the study area, as a result of an increase in the accommodation of the basin, reaching a thickness of over 1500 m in the foothills (Villegas, Bachu, Ramon &amp; Underschultz, 1994).</p>      <p>The structural behavior observed in the seismic line of <a href="#fig2">Figure 2</a> is that of a monocline with a gentle dip to the west. The line was acquired in the direction of dip, and on it are identified normal faults towards the eastern portion. Three episodes can be differentiated which, though they connect at some point, are actually different faults. The first fault originates in the basement and continues until the Cretaceous- this fault is almost vertical and controls the subsequent deformation. A second fault affects the Carbonera and Le&oacute;n Formations- this fault exhibits lesser displacement than the previous fault, but has a greater dip. The third fault affects the Guayabo Formation and the top limit of the Le&oacute;n Formation- this last one is the most recent and is probably associated with the subsidence that occurred following the elevation of the mountain range.</p>     <p>    <center><a name="fig2"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01f2.jpg"></a></center></p>      <p>The oldest fault that affects the Paleozoic, is the one that controls the subsequent deformation, and causes a weakness area that is subsequently reactivated during different tectonic events in which the other faults are originated. The little displacement in the fault prevents major changes in the thickness of the Le&oacute;n Formation, thus no fault shadow is observed in the recumbent block. From a stratigraphic standpoint, even though there is significant dissonance (Carbonera-Guadalupe), the reflectors are not truncated. Level C7 is identified by a positive maximum. Nevertheless, this horizon is not well defined, since the high porosity of this unit reduces the density, and consequently a low reflection coefficient is produced- thus this horizon loses continuity and changes its phase in some sectors.</p>      <p>Level C4 corresponds to a negative amplitude, which has been connected to a maximum flooding surface. Although it is predominantly a clayey unit, it can display facial variations in the sandy levels, resulting in some sectors, as a non-continuous horizon and presenting phase changes. Additionally, channels are common both in this unit as well as in the adjacent units C3 and C5, and these channels can be identified as amplitude anomalies.</p>      <p>The C1 level corresponds to a clear maximum positive, whose continuity varies in some sectors since this unit resembles a series of reflections that happen laterally without representing a coetaneous surface. Within this unit channels are common which, as in the C-4 level, manifest as amplitude anomalies.</p>      <p>Above the C1 level, a strong positive reflection with good continuity was identified in the whole area, which corresponds to an area consisting of limonite and fine sand, located at the base of the Le&oacute;n Formation, which could represent a maximum flooding surface.</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Some channels are observed in the western area near the C4 horizon and to the east between the C1 and C4 horizons, which produce negative amplitude anomalies or white color areas. The channel identified in the seismic data is found at the bottom left of <a href="#fig2">Figure 2</a>, between units C3 and C4.</p>      <p><font size=3><b>3. METHODOLOGY</b></font></p>      <p>The first step involved finding the relationship between the type of lithology and information garnered from the seismic study, along with the petro-physical analysis of a few wells located in another area of the basin (<i>P</i>-wave velocities, <i>S</i>, and the density).</p>      <p>A pre-stack seismic inversion was done using the genetic algorithm implemented in <i>MATLAB</i>. The performance of the algorithm was tested with synthetic and real data from another area of the basin which had well information, for which the difference between the expected and the inverted values was analyzed.</p>      <p>The inversion with the genetic algorithm in the area of interest provided pseudo-records of <i>P</i>-wave velocities, <i>S</i>, and density, which were used to build the model to make the inversion of the seismic line.</p>      <p>The results were analyzed jointly with the petrophysical analysis to establish the relationships between the lithology and the variation of the velocities and the density.</p>      <p><font size=3><b>4. ROCK PHYSICS</b></font></p>      <p>Three wells with records: Gamma Ray (<i>GR</i>), Caliper (<i>CALI</i>), Resistive (<i>ILD, ILS</i>), Density (<i>RHOB</i>), Neutron (<i>NPH</i>) and Sonic (<i>DT</i>).</p>      <p>The following equation was used to calculate the volume of clay (<i>V<sub>sh</sub></i>):</p>      <p><a name="for1"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01for1.jpg"></a></p>       ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>where <i>GR<sub>log</sub> </i>corresponds to the measurement of the registry, <i>GR<sub>sand</sub> </i>corresponds to the GR for clean sand, assigning it a value of 20, and <i>GR<sub>sh</sub> </i>is the GR value of the shale, assigning a value of 130.</p>      <p>Using neutr&oacute;n porosity (<i>&Phi;<sub>N</sub></i>), </i>which corresponds to the measurement of the record of the same &ntilde;ame, and the density porosity (<i>&Phi;<sub>D</sub></i>), </i>the porosity was calculated by:</p>      <p><a name="for2"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01for2.jpg"></a></p>       <p>where <i>RHOB<sub>log</sub> </i>corresponds to the measurement of the density record, <i>RHOB<sub>m</sub> </i>to the density of the matrix, with a valu&eacute; of 2650 kg/m<sup>3</sup> and <i>RHOB<sub>f</sub> </i>to the density of the fluid with a valu&eacute; of 1000 kg/m<sup>3</sup>. The total porosity (<i>&Phi;<sub>T</sub></i>) was calculated using the average of the porosity calculated based on the density record and the neutr&oacute;n.</p>      <p><a name="for3"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01for3.jpg"></a></p>      <p>Finally, the Effective Porosity (PHIE) was obtained from:</p>      <p><a name="for4"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01for4.jpg"></a></p>      <p>The resistivity of the connate water was calculated using the <i>Rwa </i>method, which is based on the Archie equation:</p>      <p><a name="for5"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01for5.jpg"></a></p>      <p>Assuming values of 1 for the tortuosity (<i>a</i>), 2 for the cementation coefficient (<i>m</i>) and 2 for the saturation coefficient (<i>n</i>), in an area of 100% water saturation, the resulting Archie equation for water saturation is:</p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><a name="for6"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01for6.jpg"></a></p>      <p>The water saturation was calculated using the Simandoux method, which works very well for shaly sands.</p>      <p><a name="for7"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01for7.jpg"></a></p>      <p>The resistivity of the shale (<i>R<sub>sh</sub></i>) was obtained from the record of deep resistivity with values that oscillated between 3 and 5 for the different wells.</p>      <p><a href="#fig3">Figure 3</a> shows the records of a segment of the X-4 well corresponding to the sandy and clayey units interbedded with some levels of coal. Below 6700 feet is the C7 unit of the Carbonera Formation, which is a good quality reservoir with low clay content (less than 20%) and high porosity (23%). Between 5800 and 6700 feet a set of interbedded shales, silts, and shaly sands appears. Between 5700 and 5800 feet is the C1 unit, corresponding to another sandy unit with good reservoir characteristics (<i>V<sub>sh</sub> </i>&lt; 20% and high porosity). The sandy units have an average porosity of 23%, and the only sector with hydrocarbon content is at the top of the sandy unit at about 6700 feet, and corresponds to oil, which shows that there is no intersection in the density and neutron records.</p>      <p>    <center><a name="fig3"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01f3.jpg"></a></center></p>      <p>Well X4 has no records of S-wave velocity; therefore this information was extrapolated from wells in the basin that do have these records. <a href="#fig4">Figure 4a</a> shows the correlation between the sonogram and the record of the S-wave for these wells, where the color scale indicates the clay volume. Two trends were established according to the lithology:</p>      <p>    <center><a name="fig4"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01f4.jpg"></a></center></p>       ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><a name="for8"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01for8.jpg"></a></p>     <p><a name="for9"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01for9.jpg"></a></p>       <p><i><a href="#for8">Equation 8</a></i> corresponds to sands and <a href="#for9"><i>Equation 9</i></a> to shale; <i>DTP </i>and <i>DTS </i>ind&iacute;cate the inverse of the speed expressed in <i>&micro;s</i>/ft. These relationships allow the estimation of S-wave velocity for different lithology when the rock is a binary compound with different proportions according to the Voight limit</p>      <p><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01img1.jpg"></a></p>      <p>where <i>N</i> is the number of phases, &fnof;<sub>i</sub> is the fraction of t he i-phase and <i>M<sub>i</sub></i> corresponds to the velocity of the S-wave in said phase. (Mavko, Mukerji &amp; Dvorkin, 1998). Using this procedure, S-wave velocity was estimated for the well that had the record, showing a high correlation (0,9402) between the record and the est&iacute;mate.</p>  </font>    <p><font size="2" face="Verdana"><a href="#fig4">Figure 4b</a> correlates <i>DT vs. RHOB, </i>where the colors ind&iacute;cate the clay content. The high porosity of the sands in the study area implies that these have a lower density than shale, even though its density matrix is greater. This allows the separation into two &aacute;reas with different lithology: low density and high speed in clean sands, and high densities and low velocities in shale.</font></p>  <font face="Verdana" size="2">    <p>The aforementioned indicates that when using the Gardner, Gardner and Gregory (1974) relation to est&iacute;mate the density, the sands must be separated from the shale, and the coefficients calibrated separately.</p>      <p>The <i>p</i><i>-Vs </i>relation analysis in the well X4 allowed three categories to be defined (<a href="#fig5">Figure 5</a>). Class I, characterized by low densities and high <i>Vs </i>val&uacute;es, corresponds to clean sands with good porosity. Conventional reservoirs can be found within this category. Class II correspond to an &aacute;rea of <i>p </i><i>- Vs </i>average composed of silt, very shaly sands, and clay with sand content.</p>     <p>    <center><a name="fig5"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01f5.jpg"></a></center></p>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>The rocks in this &aacute;rea have very low permeability and, although there may be some sand lev&eacute;is, the clay content decreases the effective porosity thus resulting in a very poor reservoir quality. Finally, Class III corresponds to a low <i>Vs </i>and high <i>&rho; </i>area, composed predominantly of shale and silt. This area has no properties to be considered a conventional reservoir-on the contrary, since its petro-physical characteristics transform it into a seal.</p>      <p><font size=3><b>5. GENETIC ALGORITHM</b></font></p>      <p>The GA flow is presented in <a href="#fig6">Figure 6</a>, and each step is explained below. The ProMax tool "Derive Average Wavelet" provides an average wavelet in a complete gather. The spectra of the traces within a variant space   time window are averaged to generate the spectra wavelet, using the inverse Fourier transform to construct the trace-wavelet. The spectrum of the minimum-phase wavelet is determined using the fact that the phase spectrum and the logarithm of the amplitude spectrum are pairs of the Hilbert Transform (Robinson &amp; Treitel, 2000).</p>     <p>    <center><a name="fig6"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01f6.jpg"></a></center></p>      <p>The phenotype consists of three independent binary strings. Each individual is represented by a <i>Nx52x3 </i>matrix where <i>N </i>is the number of layers, 52 bytes is the length of the chain, and the three parameters are <i>(Vp, Vs </i>and <i>p</i><i>). </i>To gen&eacute;rate the initial population, ranges for <i>Vp, Vs, </i>and <i>p</i><i>, </i>with uniform probability functions associated to the ranges of 2200 to 3800 m/s, 800 to 2200 m/s, and 2100 to 2600 kg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively were defined.</p>      <p>The reflection coefficients between two media are calculated using the following equation (Fatti <i>et al., </i>1994):</p>     <p><a name="for10"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01for10.jpg"></a></p>     <p><i>R </i>is the reflection coefficient; <i>&theta; </i>is the average for the incident and transmitted angles; <i>Vp, Vs, and</i><i> p </i>are the averages for the velocities<i> P, S, </i>and density, respectively; <i>Ip </i>and <i>Is </i>are the averages of the <i>P </i>and <i>S </i>impedances; &Delta;<i>Ip, </i>&Delta;<i>Is </i>represent the variations of the <i>P </i>and <i>S </i>impedances; and &Delta;<i>p </i>the density variation. The convolution between the series of coefficients and a wavelet creates the synthetic trace. The merit function estimates the RMS error between the seismic trace and the synthetic trace, generating an error trace. Those individu&aacute;is with better functions are selected to be crossed or mutated and form the new generation. The positions where the cross or the mutation is performed are selected based on probability functions. The individu&aacute;is which will pass to the next population are selected with another probability function, in order to maintain the population size. If additional individu&aacute;is are required, they will be taken from the previous generation. The cycle is repeated until a set number of generations is reached, where the individual with the best adaptive valu&eacute; of the last generation is the optimal solution.</p>     <p>The record was divided into angle sectors and by making the inversi&oacute;n by sector. The time window method was tested according to the length of the wavelet and by layers. The smaller number of layers in inversi&oacute;n significantly reduces the performance time, slightly deteriorating the quality of the output.</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font size="3"><b>6. ALGORITHM TESTS</b></font></p>     <p>With a seven-layer model and a 30 Hz Ricker wavelet, a synthetic seismogram was created using <a href="#for10">Equation 10</a> (see <a href="#fig7">Figure 7a</a>). The range of the seismo-gram &#91;1&deg; - 45&deg;&#93; seeks to improve the inversion density, since its contribution to the amplitude is evident in the far offsets (Fatti <i>et al</i>., 1994). The population used was 600 individuals with a total of 300 iterations. As shown in <a href="#fig7">Figure 7b</a>, the inverted values of <i>Vp</i>, <i>Vs </i>and <i>&rho; </i>(line) are quite close to the estimated (dashed line). An RMS error analysis of the inversion quantifies, by a high correlation, the good performance of the algorithm when there are far offsets and no noise. The mean errors (169 m/s; 56 m/s; 59 kg/m<sup>3</sup>) and standard deviations (85 m/s; 64 m/s; 17 kg/m<sup>3</sup>) in <i>Vp</i>, <i>Vs </i>and <i>&rho; </i>(given in <a href="#tab1">Table 1</a>) attest to this. Noise was not included in the synthetic trace, since- according to Labat <i>et al. </i>(2005) - it has low impact on pre-stacked inversions.</p>      <p>    <center><a name="fig7"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01f7.jpg"></a></center></p>     <p>    <center><a name="tab1"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01t1.jpg"></a></center></p>      <p>There were two seismic lines acquired in 1989 and registered with 120 channels, with 30 m group intervals and 30 m distance between shots. The deconvolution, the calculation of static, and the NMO correction used surface consistent algorithms, in order to preserve the variation of the amplitudes of the traces with the offset and the bandwidth. Finally, the data was migrated before stacking, and using ray tracing, the maximum angle at 23&deg; was estimated.</p>     <p>The GA was applied to the CDP258 located at the extreme end of the line that had the X4 well, further from the line than the X1, but with complete records (<i>Vp</i>, <i>Vs </i>and <i>&rho;</i>) (see results in <a href="#fig8">Figure 8</a>). The inverted <i>Vp </i>and <i>Vs </i>are close to the expected value, but without far offsets, the estimated <i>&rho; </i>is not reliable. An RMS error analysis between the inverted pseudo-record and the well record showed a distribution with average errors of (26 m/s; 30 m/s; 15 kg/m<sup>3</sup>) and standard deviations of (25 m/s; 25 m/s; 11 kg/m<sup>3</sup>) in <i>Vp</i>, <i>Vs </i>and <i>&rho; </i>(see <a href="#tab2">Table 2</a>).</p>     <p>    <center><a name="fig8"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01f8.jpg"></a></center></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>    <center><a name="tab2"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01t2.jpg"></a></center></p>      <p><font size="3"><b>7. RESULTS</b></font></p>     <p>The GA was applied to the CDP236 gather, located in an area not affected by faults or channels. Without well records, the conversion of CDP gather to gather angle was done with regional velocity gradients. With the interpretation of the horizons in a radius of several kilometers around the study area, a depth-time function to determine the depth of the units was achieved. Finally, the interval velocities were calculated from seismic time and the depths of the formations.</p>     <p>The CDP236 inversion, along with <a href="#tab2">Table 2</a>, was used to define the initial population of the GA for the inversion of the line, where the relationship <i>&rho;</i>-<i>Vp </i>of the well X-4 replaced the inverted <i>&rho;</i>. As a result of the inversion, three sections were obtained of <i>Vp</i>, <i>Vs, </i>and <i>&rho; </i>contained in <a href="#fig9">Figure 9</a>. In the sections <i>Vp </i>(<a href="#fig9">Figure 9a</a>) and <i>&rho; </i>(<a href="#fig9">Figure 9c</a>) the presence of the channel is clearer.</p>     <p>    <center><a name="fig9"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01f9.jpg"></a></center></p>      <p><font size="3"><b>8. DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS</b></font></p>     <p>The classification of <a href="#fig7">Figure 5</a> was used to analyze the sectors on both sides of the fault (see <a href="#fig2">Figure 2</a>). The relation <i>&rho;</i>-<i>Vs </i>of the first sector, between CDPs 250-270 with a potential structural trap, is shown in <a href="#fig10">Figure 10a</a>. The area within the red circle corresponds to a reservoir of good porosity and very low clay content. Within this category, two sectors can be found, 1522-1565 ms and 1738-1760 ms, which correspond to the C1 and C7 Carbonera Formation. These two units have sandy facies in this part of the basin, and therefore this result is consistent with the geological information. Additionally, based on the values of the density, a porosity of 25% for the C7 and 27% for C1 would be expected. The units C3 (1610-1640 ms) and C5 (1670-1720ms) are among the Class II and Class III, and would be composed of clays and silts with low sand content.</p>     <p>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<center><a name="fig10"><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01f10.jpg"></a></center></p>      <p>The second sector, between CDPs 30-120, is stratigraphically located between units C3 and C4 of the Carbonera Formation (<a href="#fig10">Figure 10b</a>). It is observed that most of the channel is between Classes II and III, and therefore it is interpreted that it was filled with clay and silt. With such a composition, low porosity and permeability are expected, and therefore - if there were hydrocarbons- they would be difficult to extract. Only a small part falls within Class I, very near the limit, which would make it less likely to be of good reservoir quality sand. Yet, in this case, two alternatives can be considered: the first is that this area corresponds to levels of sand containing clay, or the second option is that they correspond to silts with carbon levels of low thickness, which can reduce speed and density.</p>      <p>This result increases the risk associated to the reservoir of the channel, but this analysis was performed on a single 2-D line, so it should not be ruled out that another area of the same channel might have different properties.</p>     <p><font size="3"><b>9. CONCLUSIONS</b></font></p> <ul>    <li>    <p>To determine the lithology of the fill of a channel located in the Carbonera Formation in the basin of the Llanos Orientales (Colombia), a seismic data inversion was performed before stacking of a 2-D line. Due to the lack of well information, before making a model based inversion, a genetic algorithm was designed based on the AV O principle which did not require a priori information for the well. The algorithm performed satisfactorily in the inversion, both for synthetic seismograms as well as for real data. Although with actual data, the output quality was below that of the synthetic data, because of the absence of far offsets, the algorithm proved to be a useful tool for obtaining information about subsurface features in the absence of well information. The information obtained allowed for an inversion based on a much more reliable model than when using existing relationships in the literature because, when these relationships are not met, they lead to erroneous results.</p></li>     <li>    <p>The result indicated the presence of clay and silt in the channel, which does not completely rule out the channel as a reservoir, since the result is valid only for the area near the seismic line that was used. It is likely that in another area the characteristics of the channel filling are different.</p></li>     <li>    <p>Proper use of GA requires far offsets, so that in their absence, the density should be restricted with information from a geologically comparable well.</p></li>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<li>    <p>Algorithms like this one are very useful in new prospective areas or in offshore projects where no well information is available, as this case, or where drilling density is particularly low.</p></li>    </ul>     <p><font size="3"><b>ACKNOWLEDGMENTS</b></font></p>     <p>The authors express their thanks to Petrobras for providing the data used in this project as well as the <i>Universidad Nacional de Colombia </i>for its support to it.</p> <hr>     <p><font size="3"><b>REFERENCES</b></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p>Anderson, P. (2009). Comparing post-stack AVO inversion to prestack inversion for estimating rock properties. <i>Fron. + Innova. CSPG CSEG CWLS Convention: </i>669-672<i>.</i>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000139&pid=S0122-5383201200010000100001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Casta&ntilde;o, K., Ojeda, G. &amp; Montes, L. (2011). Thin-layer detection using spectral inversion and a genetic algorithm. <i>Earth Sci. Res. J., </i>15 (2), 121-128.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000140&pid=S0122-5383201200010000100002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Fatti, J., Smith, G., Vail, P., Strauss, P. &amp; Levitt, P. (1994). Detection of gas in sandstone reservoirs using AV O analysis: A 3D case history using geostack technique. <i>Geophysics, </i>59 (9), 1362-1376.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000141&pid=S0122-5383201200010000100003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Gardner, G., Gardner, L. &amp; Gregory, A. (1974). Formation velocity and density - the diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps. <i>Geophysics, </i>39 (6), 770-780.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000142&pid=S0122-5383201200010000100004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Gassmann, F. (1951). Elastic waves through a packing of spheres. <i>Geophysics</i>, 16 (4), 673-685.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000143&pid=S0122-5383201200010000100005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Guerrero, J., Vargas, C. &amp; Montes, L. (2010). Reservoir characterization by multiattribute analysis: The Orito field case. <i>Earth Sci. Res. J., </i>14 (2), 173-180.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000144&pid=S0122-5383201200010000100006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Koefoed, O. (1955). On the effect of Poisson's ratio of rock strata on the reflection of plane waves. <i>Geophysical Prospecting, </i>3 (4), 381-387.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000145&pid=S0122-5383201200010000100007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Labat, K., Mac&eacute;, D., Bourgeois, A., Froidevaux, P., Pichard, M. &amp; Tonellot, T. (2005). Which factors is the prestack stratigraphic inversion very sensitive to?. <i>SEG Expanded Abstracts</i>, 250-254.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000146&pid=S0122-5383201200010000100008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Mallick, S. (1999). Some practical aspects of prestack waveform inversion using a genetic algorithm: An example from the east Texas Woodbine gas sand. <i>Geophysics, </i>64 (2), 326-336.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000147&pid=S0122-5383201200010000100009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Mavko, G., Mukerji, T. &amp; Dvorkin, J. (1998). <i>The rock physics handbook: Tools for seismic analysis in porous media</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000148&pid=S0122-5383201200010000100010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Mitchell, M. (1998). <i>An introduction to genetic algorithm</i>. Reading: The MIT press.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000149&pid=S0122-5383201200010000100011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Puryear, C. &amp; Castagna, J. (2008). Layer-thickness determination and stratigraphic interpretation using spectral inversion: Theory and application. <i>Geophysics, </i>73 (2), 37-48.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000150&pid=S0122-5383201200010000100012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Robinson, E. &amp; Treitel, S. (2000). <i>Geophysical signal analysis</i>. Tulsa: SEG Books.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000151&pid=S0122-5383201200010000100013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Rua, N., Jian-hua, Y., Shuai-qi, D. &amp; Yang-guang, L. (2009). Wave impedance inversion in coalfield based on immune genetic algorithm. <i>Procedia Earth and Planetary Science</i>, 1 (1), 929-935.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000152&pid=S0122-5383201200010000100014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Sen, M. (2006). <i>Seismic Inversion</i>. Texas: Richardson. S. of Petrol. Eng.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000153&pid=S0122-5383201200010000100015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Villegas, M., Bachu, S., Ramon, J. &amp; Underschultz, J. (1994). Flow of formation waters in the Cretaceous-Miocene succession of the Llanos Basin, Colombia. <i>AAPG Bull</i>, 78: 1843-1862.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000154&pid=S0122-5383201200010000100016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><p>    <center><img src="img/revistas/ctyf/v4n5/v4n5a01img2.jpg"></center></p>  </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anderson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Comparing post-stack AVO inversion to prestack inversion for estimating rock properties]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[ CSPG CSEG CWLS Convention]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc> </conf-loc>
<page-range>669-672</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castaño]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ojeda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Montes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Thin-layer detection using spectral inversion and a genetic algorithm]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Earth Sci. Res. J]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>121-128</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fatti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Smith]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vail]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Strauss]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Levitt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Detection of gas in sandstone reservoirs using AV O analysis: A 3D case history using geostack technique]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geophysics]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>59</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
<page-range>1362-1376</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gardner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gardner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gregory]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Formation velocity and density - the diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geophysics]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>770-780</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gassmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Elastic waves through a packing of spheres]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geophysics]]></source>
<year>1951</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>673-685</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guerrero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vargas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Montes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Reservoir characterization by multiattribute analysis: The Orito field case]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Earth Sci. Res. J]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>173-180</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Koefoed]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[On the effect of Poisson's ratio of rock strata on the reflection of plane waves]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geophysical Prospecting]]></source>
<year>1955</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>381-387</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Labat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Macé]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bourgeois]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Froidevaux]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pichard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tonellot]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Which factors is the prestack stratigraphic inversion very sensitive to?]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<page-range>250-254</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[SEG Expanded Abstracts]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mallick]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Some practical aspects of prestack waveform inversion using a genetic algorithm: An example from the east Texas Woodbine gas sand]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geophysics]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>64</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>326-336</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mavko]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mukerji]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dvorkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The rock physics handbook: Tools for seismic analysis in porous media]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mitchell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[An introduction to genetic algorithm]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The MIT press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Puryear]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castagna]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Layer-thickness determination and stratigraphic interpretation using spectral inversion: Theory and application]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geophysics]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>73</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>37-48</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Robinson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Treitel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Geophysical signal analysis]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Tulsa ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[SEG Books]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rua]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jian-hua]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shuai-qi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yang-guang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Wave impedance inversion in coalfield based on immune genetic algorithm]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Procedia Earth and Planetary Science]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>929-935</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Seismic Inversion]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[^eTexas Texas]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[S. of Petrol. Eng]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Villegas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bachu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Underschultz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Flow of formation waters in the Cretaceous-Miocene succession of the Llanos Basin, Colombia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[AAPG Bull]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>78</volume>
<page-range>1843-1862</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
