SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número30Entre el nachlebeny el paradigma indiciario: Carlo Ginzburg y el método warburguiano en la historia del arteMicrohistoria italiana, antropología y archivos judiciales índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Historia y Sociedad

versión impresa ISSN 0121-8417

Resumen

CHAVES MALDONADO, María Eugenia. Anachronism in the writing of History: Error or Possibility? Some reflections about the concept of time in Carlo Ginzburg, Marc Bloch and Georges Didi-Huberman. Hist. Soc. [online]. 2016, n.30, pp.45-73. ISSN 0121-8417.  https://doi.org/10.15446/hys.n30.52609.

In his unfinished and posthumously published book Apologie pour l'histoire, Marc Bloch bestowed on future historians a seminal legacy of critical reflections on the concept of time as the object of historical analysis. During the last decades, the concept of time in History has experienced a renewed interest by professional historians, in particular in reference to the category of anachronism. The Italian historian Carlo Ginzburg and the French art historian Georges Didi-Huberman are among those engaged in this debate. This article offers a reading of two works by these historians with the purpose of underlying the fundamental influence that Marc Bloch's ideas on time had in Ginzburg and Didi-Hubermans' critical interventions.

Palabras clave : anachronism; historical time; Marc Bloch; Carlo Ginzburg; Georges Didi-Huberman.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )