Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
- Accesos
Links relacionados
- Citado por Google
- Similares en SciELO
- Similares en Google
Compartir
Estudios Socio-Jurídicos
versión impresa ISSN 0124-0579
Resumen
MARTINEZ CABALLERO, Alejandro. Types of Sentences in the Judicial Review Process: The Colombian Case. Estud. Socio-Juríd [online]. 2000, vol.2, n.1, pp.9-32. ISSN 0124-0579.
Through a study of comparative law and the jurisprudence of the Colombian Constitutional Court, this book analyzes the different kinds of decisions in the Judicial Review Process and their effects. Professor Martinez classifies constitutional decisions as Interpretative or Conditional, Integrative, and Substitutive. The first ones are those in which the normative efficiency is maintained, but the normative scope is interpreted. The second ones fill a legislative omission, and the last ones expel a regulation and fill the corresponding legal vacuum. Likewise, the study analyzes how the court sets the temporal effects of its decisions.