Abstract

ATHAR, Manazir et al. Levobupivacaine or ropivacaine: A randomised double blind controlled trial using equipotent doses in spinal anaesthesia. Rev. colomb. anestesiol. [online]. 2016, vol.44, n.2, pp.97-104. ISSN 0120-3347.

Introduction: Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine are relatively new local anaesthetics developed in order to address the issue of bupivacaine toxicity Although certain differences do exist between their pharmacological profiles, its clinical relevance at equipotent doses is not evident so far Objective: To compare the efficacy and characteristics of equipotent doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine with ropivacaine Methodology: Sixty ASA grade I/II patients of 18-60 years, either sex posted for lower limb orthopaedic surgery under spinal anaesthesia were randomly given either 15 mg levobupivacaine or 22.5 mg ropivacaine. Sensory and motor block, haemodynamic characteristics, as well as any side effects, were recorded Results: Onset of sensory block to T₁₀ was more rapid in group R than group L, p < 0.0001. The median (range) height achieved in group R was T7 (T5-T10) while in group L was T7 (T4-T10). Time to reach maximum height and time to modified Bromage grade 3 was shorter in group R as compared to group L, p < 0.0001. Levobupivacaine produced significantly longer (290.50 ± 34.67) duration of motor block compared to ropivacaine (222.50 ± 23.00). Duration of analgesia was significantly longer in group L (309.83 ± 36.45) than group R (249.50 ± 22.83). No serious adverse effects were recorded. Conclusion: Levobupivacaine produces significantly longer duration of analgesia than ropivacaine when used in a ratio of 0.6:1. Efficacy, toxicity and haemodynamic profile make ropivacaine suitable agent for surgeries with low threshold for hypotension.

Keywords : Anesthesia spinal; Anesthetics local; Hemodynamics; Bupivacaine; Anesthesia.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English | Spanish     · English ( pdf ) | Spanish ( pdf )