SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue30Between the nachleben and the evidential paradigm: Carlo Ginzburg and the warburguian method in the history of artItalian Microhistory, anthropology and judicial archives author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Historia y Sociedad

Print version ISSN 0121-8417

Abstract

CHAVES MALDONADO, María Eugenia. Anachronism in the writing of History: Error or Possibility? Some reflections about the concept of time in Carlo Ginzburg, Marc Bloch and Georges Didi-Huberman. Hist. Soc. [online]. 2016, n.30, pp.45-73. ISSN 0121-8417.  https://doi.org/10.15446/hys.n30.52609.

In his unfinished and posthumously published book Apologie pour l'histoire, Marc Bloch bestowed on future historians a seminal legacy of critical reflections on the concept of time as the object of historical analysis. During the last decades, the concept of time in History has experienced a renewed interest by professional historians, in particular in reference to the category of anachronism. The Italian historian Carlo Ginzburg and the French art historian Georges Didi-Huberman are among those engaged in this debate. This article offers a reading of two works by these historians with the purpose of underlying the fundamental influence that Marc Bloch's ideas on time had in Ginzburg and Didi-Hubermans' critical interventions.

Keywords : anachronism; historical time; Marc Bloch; Carlo Ginzburg; Georges Didi-Huberman.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )