SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número30Between the nachleben and the evidential paradigm: Carlo Ginzburg and the warburguian method in the history of artItalian Microhistory, anthropology and judicial archives índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Historia y Sociedad

versão impressa ISSN 0121-8417

Resumo

CHAVES MALDONADO, María Eugenia. Anachronism in the writing of History: Error or Possibility? Some reflections about the concept of time in Carlo Ginzburg, Marc Bloch and Georges Didi-Huberman. Hist. Soc. [online]. 2016, n.30, pp.45-73. ISSN 0121-8417.  https://doi.org/10.15446/hys.n30.52609.

In his unfinished and posthumously published book Apologie pour l'histoire, Marc Bloch bestowed on future historians a seminal legacy of critical reflections on the concept of time as the object of historical analysis. During the last decades, the concept of time in History has experienced a renewed interest by professional historians, in particular in reference to the category of anachronism. The Italian historian Carlo Ginzburg and the French art historian Georges Didi-Huberman are among those engaged in this debate. This article offers a reading of two works by these historians with the purpose of underlying the fundamental influence that Marc Bloch's ideas on time had in Ginzburg and Didi-Hubermans' critical interventions.

Palavras-chave : anachronism; historical time; Marc Bloch; Carlo Ginzburg; Georges Didi-Huberman.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )