SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.12 número19Errores en la estrategia argumentativa de la interpretación providencialista de la mano invisible de adam smith: el caso de la teoría de los sentimientos moralesRead y el mentiroso índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Discusiones Filosóficas

versión impresa ISSN 0124-6127

Resumen

RAGA ROSALENY, Vicente. Irony, knowledge and subjectivity: A philosophical reading of Michel de Montaigne's essays. discus.filos [online]. 2011, vol.12, n.19, pp.257-273. ISSN 0124-6127.

Irony is rarely discussed from a philosophical perspective and even less when it is a question of Metaphysics, like the problem of truth or the question of the subject. From Hegel to our days only occasionally scholars have studied irony and, for this reason, thinkers as the ironic Michel de Montaigne are often considered marginal authors in the history of philosophy, despite his central contribution to the modern philosophical style with the essay. In this article, I propose a metaphysical reading of the work of this French author taking care of the ironic style of his essays. Taking into account the notions of knowledge and subjectivity I will analyze the readings that have been done on "the Socratic" character of the Essays showing their philosophical relevance and, therefore, the weight of the concept of irony in any contemporary philosophical reflection.

Palabras clave : Knowledge; irony; pragmatic reading; semantic reading; subjectivity.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons