SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 suppl.1Algebraic representation of continuaAlgebraic closure in continuous logic author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas

Print version ISSN 0034-7426

Rev.colomb.mat. vol.41  suppl.1 Bogotá Oct. 2007

 

Simplicity simplified

ENRIQUE CASANOVAS1

1Departamento de Lógica, Historia y Filosofía de la Ciencia, Universidad de Barcelona, España. E-mail: e.casanovas@ub.edu


Abstract

We expose the foundations of simple theories in a straightforward way including many improved proofs which can only be found scattered in the specialized literature. We start with general model theory and finish with the proof of the independence theorem.

Key words: Model Theory, Simple Theories, Forking, Independence.


2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 03C4

Resumen

Exponemos los fundamentos de las teorías simples de manera muy directa e incorporando muchas mejoras de demostraciones que están dispersas en la literatura especializada. Comenzamos con la teoría general de modelos y llegamos hasta la prueba del teorema de la independencia.

Palabras clave: Teorí de modelos, teorís simples, forking, independencia.


Texto completo disponible en PDF


References

1 J. T. Baldwin, Forking and multiplicity in first order theories, in Y. Zhang (ed.) Logica and Algebra, Contemporary Mathematics, AMS, Providence, R.I. 302 (2002), 205-221.         [ Links ]

2 E. Casanovas, The number of types in simple theories, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 98 (1999), 69-86.         [ Links ]

3 E. Casanovas, Some remarks on indiscernible sequences, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 49 (2003), 475-478.         [ Links ]

4 E. Casanovas, D. Lascar, A. Pillay, & M. Ziegler, Galois groups of first order theories, Journal of Mathematical Logic, 1 (2001), 305-319.         [ Links ]

5 R. Grossberg, J. Iovino, & O. Lessmann, A primer of simple theories, Archive for Mathematical Logic, 41 (2002), 541-580.         [ Links ]

6 B. Kim, Forking in simple unstable theories, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 57 (1998), 257-267.         [ Links ]

7 B. Kim, Simple first order theories, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Notre Dame, 1996.         [ Links ]

8 B. Kim & A. Pillay, Simple theories, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 88 (1997), 149-164.         [ Links ]

9 B. Kim & A. Pillay, From stability to simplicity, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 4 (1998), 17-36.         [ Links ]

10 Z. Shami, Definability in low simple theories, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 65 (2000), 1481-1490.         [ Links ]

11 S. Shelah, Classification theory, North Holland P.C., Amsterdam, 1978.         [ Links ]

12 S. Shelah, Simple unstable theories, Annals of Mathematical Logic, 19 (1980), 177-203.         [ Links ]

13 F. O. Wagner, Simple Theories, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 2000.         [ Links ]

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License